Currently, the American capital market is welcoming a cryptocurrency payment experiment from Hong Kong. According to various sources, the dollar-denominated payment company RedotPay headquartered in Hong Kong is considering an IPO in the U.S., with a potential fundraising scale described as "over $1 billion", though no more detailed ranges or use breakdowns have appeared. In the cryptocurrency payment field, it is rare to see a combination that involves both dollar-denominated assets and collaborations with leading Wall Street investment banks like JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Jefferies to advance IPO preparations, which has made RedotPay's developments quickly enter the global spotlight. The real suspense lies in: in a dollar-denominated asset market where growth has clearly slowed and regulatory uncertainties have risen, whether this IPO fundraising of over $1 billion is the prelude to the next expansion cycle or a stress test of Wall Street's risk appetite.
Hong Kong Company Playing the U.S. Card: RedotPay's Positioning and Path Choice
● Business Profile and Geographic Positioning: Public information shows that RedotPay is a fintech company that provides payment and settlement services around dollar-denominated assets, building low-friction capital channels between merchants and users, with its trading and clearing system deeply reliant on on-chain infrastructure. That it is headquartered in Hong Kong is currently a moderate-confidence point, but it is enough to outline a business picture of "operating in Asia and connecting global funds," explaining why it emphasizes cross-border characteristics in both technical architecture and compliance narratives.
● Motivation for Choosing an IPO in the U.S.: For Hong Kong fintech companies, local or mainland capital markets each have advantages in regulatory frameworks and investor structures, but the global valuation system and liquidity depth priced in dollars still mainly concentrate in the U.S. An IPO in the U.S. means potential premium in terms of fundraising scale, valuation multiple, circulation depth, and coverage by international investors, and can also more directly connect to dollar-based institutional capital pools. In the current geopolitical and regulatory environment, this choice is both a consideration of capital efficiency and a game of brand and compliance labeling.
● Signals of Wall Street Investment Banking Participation: RedotPay's collaboration with JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Jefferies to prepare for its IPO is seen as a key move to proactively connect with global dollar capital and regulatory expectations. These three investment banks have consistently been cautious with crypto-related projects, and participation itself represents that their internal risk control, compliance, and reputation management departments have undergone a lengthy screening process, also indicating that future prospectus documents will be polished with the goal of being "understood and accepted by U.S. institutional investors" regarding information disclosure, governance structures, and risk factor design.
● Expected Role as a Benchmark: In the general market perception, if RedotPay successfully lists on the U.S. capital market, it will become an important example for cryptocurrency payment companies entering the mainstream equity market. Regardless of its final valuation and fundraising scale, the structure of the order book, composition of investors, and performance in the secondary market will be viewed by other companies in the same field as a "pricing reference," and may even create a new comparison and follow-up effect in the listing destination choices of Asian fintech companies.
Slow Growth of Dollar Assets: Can It Support the $30 Trillion Narrative?
● The Reality of Market Growth Slowing: Over the past year, although the overall market value of dollar-denominated assets remains high, the expansion curve has noticeably slowed, with trading and settlement demand showing strong dependence on the macro environment. The high interest rate environment has elevated the attractiveness of traditional dollar assets, causing some funds to flow back to money market funds and short-term debt; at the same time, the uncertainty of regulations in the U.S. and other jurisdictions regarding on-chain dollar assets has made some institutions more restrained in new allocations, which has temporarily suppressed payment and cross-border settlement demand.
● Matrixport's $30 trillion Prediction: In this transitional period, Matrixport cites U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and believes the market scale of dollar-denominated assets will expand to $30 trillion in the long term. This judgment is seen in the industry as a "long-term forecast" rather than a short-term guide, emphasizing the structural role that on-chain dollar assets may play in global settlement, cross-border payments, and financial infrastructure, so this article clearly marks this as an analytical institution's viewpoint, not a settled fact.
● The Tension between "Short-term Slowdown vs. Long-term Blueprint": On one side, the current trading demand is suppressed, causing growth to slow due to regulatory and interest rate environment constraints; on the other side is the mid- to long-term expansion blueprint of $30 trillion. This tension underpins the narrative behind RedotPay's rush for its IPO. From a business perspective, proactively knocking on the door of the U.S. capital market during the mid-cycle is aimed at using equity financing to lock in future expansion chips; from an investor's perspective, it is about finding a reasonable discount between "limited current growth" and "enormous future space."
● Investor Concerns about Payment Sector Penetration Rates: Within this narrative, the real question investors will ask is: if the total scale of dollar-denominated assets expands as predicted, how large a piece of the cake can the payment and settlement sector obtain? This depends not only on RedotPay's own technology, licenses, and coverage of scenarios but also on its ability to convert on-chain scale into actual transaction volumes, merchant retention, and fee revenues. In other words, total market capitalization growth does not automatically equate to high growth in payment business; penetration rates and monetization efficiency will become the core variables in valuation discussions.
Wall Street Investment Banking Bets: RedotPay as a Touchstone for "Cryptocurrency Payment IPO"
● Signal Strength of Investment Banking Involvement: The simultaneous appearance of JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Jefferies is the most watched part of this IPO narrative. As institutions that are extremely sensitive in the intersection of traditional finance and crypto, they maintain a cautious attitude toward related projects and typically conduct multiple rounds of due diligence on compliance paths, anti-money laundering controls, asset security, and governance structures. Their joint participation in preparations indicates at least an assessment that this project has a foundational basis for regulatory communication and business sustainability.
● Industry Judgment on "Testing Market Acceptance": Some industry analysts point out that "RedotPay's IPO will test the market's acceptance of cryptocurrency payment companies"; this assertion remains to be validated but indeed reflects a consensus within the industry: payment infrastructure, after bitcoin mining companies and trading platforms, is a segment of the traditional equity market that has not been fully priced. Regardless of how the final order book performs, it will reflect Wall Street's real assessment of risk premiums, growth expectations, and regulatory uncertainties.
● Institutional Layout Path After ETFs: Since the approval of spot bitcoin ETFs, traditional institutions have established exposure to crypto assets through public offerings at the pricing level. The next step, is to layout "shovels and roads" through equities and IPO targets—which means infrastructure and payment gateways—becomes a natural extension. Companies like RedotPay, which provide trading, custody, and payment services around dollar-denominated assets, are seen as a link that can connect crypto traffic with traditional cash flow discounting logic, aligning with some institutions' preference of "wanting to participate in the sector without directly holding on-chain assets."
● Technical Dimension in Wall Street Evaluation: At a more technical level, Wall Street investment institutions will measure the investability of such assets from three dimensions: order book depth, pricing discounts/premiums, and allocation structures. Order book depth reflects real buyer power and liquidity resilience; discounts/premiums reveal the investors' required risk premium for regulatory and business risks; the allocation structure, including the proportion of institutions versus retail investors, lock-up period arrangements, and green shoe mechanisms, determines the controllability of stock price fluctuations post-listing and the medium to long-term performance in the secondary market.
Compliance Answers for Crypto IPOs Under the Shadow of SEC Scrutiny
● Historical Context of Stricter Review: In recent years, the U.S. SEC has shown a clear tightening trend in the review of crypto-related IPOs, SPACs, and direct listings. Multiple projects involving on-chain assets, trading platforms, or related derivative services have either been required to supplement significant amounts of risk disclosures and business explanations, causing repeated delays in timelines, or diverged too much from regulatory perspectives on key nodes like compliance paths and asset attribute definitions, ultimately failing to enter the public market. If RedotPay submits materials, it will inevitably find itself in this review environment.
● Core Issues in Information Disclosure: For a company providing dollar-denominated payment services, the prospectus must confront several key questions: first, compliance path, including the types of licenses relied upon, jurisdictions covered, and alignment with existing and proposed regulations; second, the safety and transparency of reserve assets, how to prove they are sufficient, low risk, and quickly liquidatable; third, counterparty and on-chain risks, such as vulnerabilities in smart contracts, bankruptcy of partner institutions, and liquidity shocks triggered by black swan events, all of which need thorough disclosure in the risk factor section.
● Concerns RedotPay Will Likely Need to Address: During the prospectus and roadshow stages, RedotPay is expected to systematically respond to core questions from regulators and institutional investors, including but not limited to: its licensing or registration arrangements in different markets, how it handles suspicious transactions and sanctions lists, and liquidity management plans under extreme market conditions. Due to the lack of publicly available details, this article does not speculate on any specific terms or regulatory statements, but it is foreseeable that compliance narratives will become one of the main axes in the roadshow speeches.
● A Real-World Experiment on the Definition of "Cryptocurrency Payment Companies": Regardless of whether the review process goes smoothly, RedotPay's application itself will be viewed as a real test for how the SEC redefines the regulatory boundaries for "cryptocurrency payment companies." Regulators need to find a new balance between "technology-neutral, functional regulation" and "preventing systemic risks," while the market is concerned about which business models, risk controls, and information disclosure frameworks can gain limited acceptance from the U.S. regulatory system, which will create a demonstration effect for the listing paths of a subsequent batch of similar companies.
From Hong Kong to Wall Street: The Migration of Capital and Regulatory Discourse Power
● Disparities Between Openness and Capital Depth: Hong Kong's policy attitude toward dollar-denominated assets and payment businesses has been relatively open in the past two years, sending signals to attract fintech companies through pilot licensing, regulatory sandboxes, and public-private partnerships; whereas the U.S. capital market still dominates in capital scale, institutional participation, and valuation discourse power. This "friendly regulatory environment vs deep capital market" disparity forces companies like RedotPay to find balance in both regions: incubating and operating in Hong Kong while achieving pricing and exits in the U.S.
● Old Pathways and New Uncertainties for Hong Kong Companies Going Public in the U.S.: From a longer-term perspective, it’s not new for companies from Hong Kong and the mainland to go public in the U.S., but under the current geopolitical and auditing regulatory environment, this path faces more variables. Issues such as data cross-border, access to accounting working papers, and compliance standards alignment will double the scrutiny on companies linked to on-chain dollar assets. RedotPay's decision to embark on this path means it must build a compliance “bridge” between multiple regulatory systems, and its ability to successfully gain the trust of U.S. regulators and investors will receive heightened attention.
● Demonstration Effect for Hong Kong and Asian Crypto Fintech: If RedotPay successfully pushes forward with its U.S. IPO process, regardless of valuation levels, it may become a referential example for other Hong Kong or Asian fintech companies to evaluate their paths. Once the market verifies that the model of "operating with a focus in Hong Kong and being capital-centric in the U.S." is feasible, cryptocurrency trading, custody, risk control technology, and payment companies may trigger new discussions on listing destinations, with some companies even possibly adjusting their equity and business structures in advance to better connect with U.S. regulatory and investor expectations.
● Reconfiguration of Regulatory and Capital Discourse Power: This IPO attempt from Hong Kong to Wall Street is not just a financing event for the company, but also a reconfiguration of discourse power in the crypto financial industry chain between the Asia-Pacific and the U.S. Who defines compliance standards, who leads valuation methods, and who has regulatory and pricing rights over cross-border payment infrastructure will gradually take shape in similar transactions. RedotPay is merely a pawn, but the direction it moves will, to some extent, reveal the flow trajectories of capital and regulatory forces in the coming years.
The Prologue to the $30 Trillion Narrative: Who is Betting on RedotPay, Who is Betting on the Future
RedotPay intends to go public in the U.S., choosing the U.S. capital market as a stage at this moment, and binding itself with Wall Street investment banks such as JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, and Jefferies, combined with its Hong Kong operating background, makes this transaction symbolically exceed mere corporate financing. It is both a probe into the patience and tolerance of U.S. regulation and an open vote on whether traditional institutions are willing to pay a premium for the cryptocurrency payment sector.
In the medium term, at least three scenarios can be outlined: first, the IPO proceeds smoothly, and after meeting SEC information disclosure and compliance requirements, raises funds at a relatively ideal valuation and scale; second, it faces regulatory delays, elongating the timeline through rounds of inquiry and supplementary disclosures, causing changes in valuation expectations and market sentiment; third, despite significant shrinkage in valuation and fundraising scale, it still completes the listing, trading off a price compromise for a public market identity in a high-uncertainty environment. Behind these three paths lies the dynamic game of regulatory intensity and market risk appetite.
For potential investors, what’s truly worth tracking in the long term is not short-term sentiment or daily fluctuations, but three more structural clues: the continuous growth of underlying trading volume, the pace of progress in cross-border compliance layouts, and the marginal changes in regulatory attitudes from the U.S. and other major jurisdictions. Only when these three clues simultaneously evolve favorably, can payment companies convert the scale of dollar-denominated assets into sustainable cash flows that can be discounted.
In the context of the "$30 trillion market size" prediction proposed by Matrixport, RedotPay is at best just a character in the prologue of the narrative. What truly determines who can stand at the center stage is not the glamorous packaging of a single IPO, but who can, over a long period of regulatory adjustments and technological evolution, solidify the surging dollar assets and cross-border demands into a robust, transparent, and auditable revenue curve.
Join our community to discuss and get stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Benefit Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefit Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
