As of June 30, 2026, the annual net outflow from Bitcoin spot ETFs in the United States has exceeded 100,000 BTC, with a cumulative net outflow of over 160,000 BTC since the peak holding point in October 2025, setting a record for the largest annual outflow since the existence of these products. At the same time, long-term holders on-chain are locking up their chips more tightly - their holdings have risen to about 16 million BTC, reaching a historical high. More tension arises as the long-term holders' MVRV ratio has dropped to about 1.24, close to its lowest point in nearly three years. This means that the market price is only about 24% higher than the average cost line for this group. At the current price of approximately $59,000 with a cost basis of about $48,400, long-term holders have an average unrealized profit of about 24%, with a relative cost premium of approximately 19%. CryptoQuant analysts Darkfost and Axel Adler Jr. point out that the record outflow of funds from the ETF side, combined with the price position near long-term holders' cost line, is often seen as a typical combination indicating the end of a bear market or a bottoming area in historical samples. However, whether this is truly replicating past cycle bottoms or just a segment within a larger fluctuation remains a core uncertainty that current market participants cannot avoid.

The Alarm of 100,000 Annual Outflows from ETFs

Data shows that by 2026 to date, the capital withdrawal scale from U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs has constituted an abnormal signal. CryptoQuant statistics show that as of June 30 within the year 2026, the net outflow from this type of ETF has exceeded 100,000 BTC, and Darkfost stated that this marks the largest annual outflow record since the birth of spot ETFs. This implies that in less than a year, a significant amount of Bitcoin has been transferred out from the custodian end within the ETF system, and such annual outflows alone are enough to reshape market perceptions of "ETF = incremental capital inflow."

If we extend the timeline, since the overall holdings of U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs reached a peak in October 2025, as of June 30, 2026, the cumulative net outflow has exceeded 160,000 BTC, of which more than 60% occurred during 2026. This pace depicts a continuous rather than one-time withdrawal process: institutions and investors allocating Bitcoin through ETFs have chosen to respond to price and environmental changes over the past few months by redeeming and reducing their positions. For the spot market, such a clear directional and concentrated outflow from ETFs may increase supply-side pressure on liquidity, requiring spot buying to continue absorbing the thrown-off chips, while also reinforcing the narrative of "capital is withdrawing" on the emotional dimension, making the movement of ETF funds an important variable influencing short-term price fluctuations and risk preferences.

16 Million BTC Hoarded: Long-term Side Aligns

In contrast to the cumulative net outflow of over 160,000 BTC from the ETF since October 2025, as of June 30, 2026, the holdings of long-term Bitcoin holders have risen to a historical high of about 16 million BTC. CryptoQuant defines this group as a collection of addresses that have held their coins for a long time and are insensitive to short-term price fluctuations, indicating that during the phase of "funds voting with their feet," the core holder group has not reduced their positions in tandem; rather, they have continued the trend of accumulating chips overall. In terms of capital type, on one side, there is short-term or quasi-short-term capital represented by ETFs, which is prone to liquidity and performance evaluation cycles and is continuously redeeming; on the other side, there are long-term holders represented by capital with higher tolerance, continuously hoarding. Both sides have given distinctly different market attitudes at the same point in time.

This differentiation in holding structures significantly impacts the supply and price fluctuations in the spot market, making it an important variable to understand the current cycle. ETF redemptions increase the circulating chips on paper, but a considerable portion of this is absorbed and locked by long-term holders in the "highland position" of 16 million BTC, meaning that the increase in chips flowing into the market and available for sale does not equate to the nominal outflow scale of ETFs. Long-term holders are insensitive to short-term fluctuations and typically only adjust their positions collectively when prices deviate significantly from their costs or when macro assumptions are broken. This behavioral pattern, in the context of high holding bases, objectively weakens the chain of selling pressure transmitted by short-term capital in and out. Therefore, when prices encounter concentrated selling, they depend more on the marginal buying and limited circulating chips' dynamics rather than panic selling by all holders.

MVRV Drops to 1.24: A Bear Market Signal Reappears?

Against the backdrop of continuous outflows from ETFs, what is more critical is the on-chain position of long-term holders. The long-term holders' MVRV can be understood as "the current price relative to the multiple of the average cost of holding long-term coins," which is a core indicator to assess the profit space and selling pressure for this portion of assets: the higher the ratio, the more substantial the profit for long-term chips, making them more likely to turn into selling pressure when sentiment weakens; the closer the ratio is to 1, the more the price is approaching the long-term cost line, thinning the safety cushion for holders but also correspondingly weakening the motivation for large-scale profit-taking. The latest reading given by CryptoQuant data is about 1.24, with the corresponding cost basis for long-term holders being about $48,400, while the current price is approximately $59,000, with a relative cost premium of about 19%. Long-term holders have an average unrealized profit of about 24%, and overall, this has approached a low point in nearly three years.

This combination has certain indicative significance in history. CryptoQuant analyst Axel Adler Jr. points out that the current MVRV level of 1.24 is one of the lowest in nearly three years, indicating that prices have pressed down to near the cost band of long-term holders. Historically, similar scenarios of "price touching cost + MVRV approaching low" have often appeared at the end of bear markets or during price bottoming phases and are viewed as typical characteristics of bottom areas. Coupled with the fact that current long-term holders' holdings are at a historical high of about 16 million BTC, it suggests that even with continuous outflows on the ETF side, the core chips remain locked on-chain in a low-profit, strong-holding state, indicating that the market is more likely approaching a balance point supported by the long-term cost line rather than being at a top where universal high profits could cause a snowball effect of profit-taking.

$59,000 vs. $48,400: Market Premium Compressed

Focusing on specific numbers, as of June 30, the current price of Bitcoin is about $59,000, while the cost basis for long-term holders is around $48,400, resulting in a relative cost premium of about 19%. In other words, the "safety cushion" for long-term chips has dwindled to less than 20%, so if the price retreats a few percentage points, the floating profits of the old coins on-chain will rapidly compress. Combined with the data showing that long-term holders have an average unrealized profit of about 24%, the profit level in this round of the cycle is significantly lower than typical bull market peaks where premiums are often significantly inflated. The current situation is more like a standoff area with low profits and low safety cushions, rather than a peak period where everyone holds excessive profits.

The direct implication of the compressed premium is that the deviation space of the price relative to the long-term cost line is converging: upwards, the distance is not large enough, making it hard to support strong sentiment of "hold without care for dips"; downwards, once a price drop occurs, it will quickly approach the $48,400 level, causing many long-term holders to slide from slight profits to near their costs, thus forcing the game between selling pressure and buying to develop prematurely. In this pattern where space is narrow at both ends, the market is more likely to conduct a back-and-forth redistribution of chips around the long-term cost line rather than extending along a high premium bubble-like trend.

End of Bear Market or Prelude to Prolonged Consolidation?

A framework built from the data is more important than directly betting on direction: one axis is ETF funds, with net outflows from U.S. Bitcoin spot ETFs exceeding 100,000 BTC in 2026, and cumulative outflows surpassing 160,000 BTC since the peak in October 2025, which CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost deems the largest annual outflow since this product's inception; another axis is the chip structure, with long-term holders' holdings around 16 million BTC as of June 30, reaching a historical high, indicating that the retreat has primarily involved short-term and passive capital, while high-confidence holders have clustered their chips; the third axis is relative valuation to cost, as current long-term holders have an MVRV of about 1.24, nearing a three-year low, with the price of about $59,000 only having a premium of about 19% over the $48,400 cost basis, and long-term holders having an average unrealized profit of about 24%. Analyst Axel Adler Jr. assesses that the price is nearing the long-term cost line. Historically, when the combination of "significant net outflows from ETFs + long-term holders' holdings reaching new highs + long-term holders' MVRV approaching low" appears, it is often seen as a typical characteristic of the later stages of a bear market or bottom areas; however, it does not constitute a certainty in future price movements. In this framework, what is crucial is to track the marginal changes among these three types of data: firstly, whether net outflows from the ETF side significantly narrow or even turn into net inflows; secondly, whether long-term holders' MVRV continues to probe down to near or below the cost line; thirdly, during these fluctuations, whether the high-level holdings of approximately 16 million BTC by long-term holders are passively diluted or maintained, or even reached new highs. The evolution of these variables will determine whether the current stage resembles a bottom repair after the end of a bear market or is the true beginning of a longer period of consolidation.

Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。