Author: Blue Fox Notes

Saylor's announcement marks an important turning point in the development history of the BTC treasury company. (Related reading:MicroStrategy releases self-rescue script, the game and calculation behind the $1.25 billion coin sale)

Why do I say this?

Because this is not a simple capital operation, but a transformation of the model.

It is an important shift from the original "one-way leveraged accumulation" to "two-way active capital management."

The historical positioning of the strategy started from "Bitcoin leverage machine," gradually evolving:

Historically, there are mainly three phases:

2020-2024:

“Classic convertible bonds + common stock issuance” used to buy BTC. MSTR became the purest leveraged BTC tool in the market, trading at high premiums to mNAV (modified net asset value).

First half of 2025-2026:

“Digital credit era.” Launch of STRC (variable rate perpetual preferred stock), STRK, STRF, STRD, and other Bitcoin-backed perpetual preferred stock products.

The goal is to strip away the volatility of Bitcoin and create high-yield "digital credit" products, attracting fixed-income funds while continuing to buy BTC.

After the announcement on June 29, 2026:

Active capital management framework was established:

• First, the dollar reserve policy (building a $2.55 billion reserve, only to be used for dividends and interest, covering a minimum of 12 months);
• Second, STRC dividend raised to 12%;
• Third, a $1 billion digital credit repurchase authorization + $1 billion MSTR repurchase authorization;
• Fourth, a BTC monetization plan, the core change, which means selling a portion of the coins when necessary, no longer solely holding without selling;
• Fifth, common stock issuance discipline (cautiously issuing close to 1x mNAV).
• In plain language,

Saylor acknowledges that the pure HODL model of “only buying and not selling” has vulnerabilities under high fixed costs (preferred stock dividends ~ $17.6/year), and now begins to establish defensive tools while retaining offensive capability.

What is the impact of this announcement?

The most critical part is the selling of coins.

In the past, Saylor repeatedly emphasized “never selling Bitcoin,”

now there is formal authorization to sell under specific conditions.

Though there are constraints:

1. Selling BTC can only be used for three things: supplementing dollar reserves (with a cap of $1.25 billion), paying dividends/interest, and repurchasing its own securities;

2. Total liquidity coverage should reach $3.8 billion ≈ 25.9 months of dividend + interest expenditure.

3. This isn't random buying; there are limitations, with clear caps and purposes, it is tactical monetization.

In fact, this behavior is more rational. For the long term of BTC, it is overall favorable, breaking the original market expectations, making the strategy sustainable, rather than being a ticking time bomb.

Because preferred stock dividends are a hard obligation. In extreme bear markets + liquidity exhaustion, without active asset management tools, the results could be:

Suspending dividends leads to credit default risk, then having to issue new shares at extremely low valuations, diluting common shareholders, ultimately forced into a death spiral by low-priced BTC sales.

With this framework, Saylor's strategy can use limited BTC to exchange for time and credit stability under stress-testing scenarios.

It is akin to establishing a lender of last resort mechanism for "digital credit" products, but this lender is its own BTC reserves.

In terms of specific impacts,

• For preferred stockholders: Clearly favorable. STRC is currently trading at ~74–76 dollars (well below the target face value of 100 dollars), with the raised dividend + reserve endorsement expected to return to face value.
• For common stock (MSTR) shareholders: Double-edged sword. The repurchase authorization is favorable (especially at the current low), but BTC monetization introduces the narrative of "potential selling pressure," which may compress MSTR's premium to mNAV.
• Saylor himself: Diluted the narrative of “Bitcoin purity.” His voice in the BTC community has diminished. However, for him, survival is paramount, avoiding a blow-up is the priority. For the BTC community, it is also a good thing; diluting influence is more beneficial for the long term than concentration.

Assuming Saylor sells $1.25 billion of BTC, based on the current holdings of ~847,000 BTC, the amount involved is relatively controllable (it will not be a catastrophic sell-off).

However, it is necessary to observe execution discipline, whether it is only used when really necessary, and whether there will be replenishment in a bull market.

This time, introducing the framework is essentially a defensive preposition, preparing early, giving the market an expectation.

Overall evaluation is:

In the long term, it is favorable for BTC, as a treasury company with huge BTC reserves begins to adopt active asset management strategies, making it controllable, significantly reducing the probability of being forced to sell low, leading to a death spiral.

Upgraded from “simple holding” to “manageable balance sheet business.”

It will also lower the psychological threshold for other traditional companies/institutions to adopt Bitcoin as a reserve asset.

“Digital credit” becomes a credible narrative, no longer an unsustainable narrative of “only buying and not selling,”

future BTC treasury companies can adopt the same framework: “dollar reserve policy + limited monetization + repurchase discipline” for active asset management.

However, there are also potential risks:

Selling coins in a bear market may form potential selling pressure.

Breaking the extreme narrative of “absolute scarcity + never selling” may have psychological impacts on the market; it could have slight negative effects on BTC prices in the short term.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。