On June 10, 2026, the U.S. Central Command launched substantial strikes against Iran, which was accused of shooting down an "Apache" helicopter, in the name of "self-defense and retaliation." Around 5 PM Eastern Time, the first round of operations lit up simultaneously on radar screens and news tickers. The strike was aimed directly at the eastern part of Hormozgan Province in southern Iran, with explosions reported from key nodes near the Strait of Hormuz, such as Kish Island, Sirik, and Minab. The local air defense system was activated, indicating that firepower was closing in on the world's most critical oil shipping lane. Almost simultaneously, the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard announced that missiles and drones had been launched against U.S. targets in the region, stepping out of years of "proxy wars" into open direct fire between the U.S. military and Iranian forces. U.S. officials then confirmed that a second round of strikes was underway, targeting Iran's air defense and radar systems to clear a path for possible follow-up air operations. As firepower covered the surrounding area of the Strait of Hormuz, what the market truly needed to reevaluate was not just the military situation itself, but the risk premium corresponding to oil supply security, the inflation expectations rising subsequently, and the repricing pressures on the dollar and interest rate paths under this chain reaction. This piece will follow the main line of "Energy - Inflation - Dollar - Risk Appetite" to dissect how this Middle Eastern war penetrates tanker routes and yield curves beyond the screen, ultimately affecting the pricing and capital flows of on-chain dollar assets such as BTC, ETH, and USDT.
Escalation of the Retaliation Chain: Continuous Explosions within 24 Hours
From the timeline's perspective, this is a retaliation chain with almost no buffer zone: On Day T-1, a U.S. "Apache" helicopter was shot down in a relevant region in the Middle East, and the U.S. immediately characterized it as "an unprovoked act of aggression." Reports mentioned that Trump directed the military to prepare for retaliatory actions, laying the political groundwork for subsequent military escalation. On Day T (June 10), around 5 PM Eastern Time, U.S. Central Command initiated the first round of strikes in the eastern part of Hormozgan Province, simultaneously describing it as "self-defense and retaliatory." Almost at the same time, explosions were heard in Hormozgan Province's Kish Island, Sirik, and Minab, activating the local air defense system, and the conflict directly ignited in critical areas near the Strait of Hormuz. Subsequently, the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard publicly announced that it had launched missiles and drones towards U.S. targets in the region, transitioning from long-term reliance on proxy armed confrontations to direct attacks on U.S. military targets. Meanwhile, U.S. officials confirmed that a second round of strikes was ongoing, focused on destroying Iran’s air defense and radar systems to eliminate "air obstacles" for potential future operations. From "self-defense" to "retaliation," and from each other's second round to even more rounds of expected actions, the qualitative nature of the conflict had shifted from being controllable within limited punitive strikes to a potential chain-reaction cycle of reciprocal retaliation.
For the global asset pricing framework, this fast-paced retaliation chain, completing two rounds of strikes and one missile counterattack within 24 hours, forced the market to abandon the optimistic scenario of "single event shock - rapid downgrade," instead integrating a longer-tail, more recurrent geopolitical fluctuation into the risk premium. Historical experience indicates that heightened tensions in the Middle East typically raise oil-related risk premiums and inflation expectations, leading to increased implied demands for future interest rates. Under this chain, global high Beta assets need to be repriced according to a combination of "higher discount rates + greater tail risks." BTC and ETH are typically classified as high Beta assets similar to growth stocks from a macro perspective. Once the conflict shifts from controllable retaliation to a retaliation chain, the volatility parameters and drawdown tolerances in risk models will be rapidly adjusted upwards, leverage funds and short-term allocations are likely to first reduce positions and prioritize traditional safe-haven assets like the dollar and U.S. treasury bonds, retracting risk exposure from high elasticity assets such as BTC and ETH. Conversely, some regional investors may seek short-term "on-chain dollar" safe havens through dollar-pegged assets like USDT, but this does not alter one core fact: before the retaliation chain is clearly "capped," the mainstream pricing anchor for BTC and ETH will lean more towards the "high Beta risk asset" side rather than "stable safe-haven assets," and their price fluctuations will be highly sensitive to each subsequent signal of military escalation or de-escalation.
The Shadow of Missiles Over Hormozgan Presses on Oil
When explosions are reported in the eastern part of Hormozgan Province, Kish Island, Sirik, and Minab, accompanied by the activation of local air defense systems, the market’s real tension doesn't come from these place names themselves, but from their geographical positioning on the map—they are close to the Strait of Hormuz, the throat of global oil shipping. Even without any official conclusions regarding "whether the Strait is blocked," merely the presence of missiles and air defense systems in the area is sufficient for traders to quickly adjust their "geopolitical risk premium" in oil: insurance rates, transportation expectations, and potential supply disruption scenarios will all be rewritten into models, and the risk factors in oil price curves will naturally be boldened.
From the chain of macro variables, the uncertainty of Hormozgan initially raises uncertainty in oil supply, followed by global inflation expectations. Historical instances, such as the attacks on tankers in 2019 and the escalation of U.S.-Iran tensions in 2020, show that oil risk premiums rise while markets simultaneously adjust future inflation and geopolitical risk assumptions, forcing trading desks to reprice nominal interest rate paths and real interest levels: either higher rates for longer, or concerns about central banks passively tolerating higher inflation. Both paths are unfriendly to high-duration, high-volatility assets, primarily squeezing growth stocks, where cash flows are raised in the future and discount rates have also increased, similarly logic will temporarily compress the acceptable valuation range of BTC and ETH. From the funding perspective, they resemble a basket of cash flows that are extremely distant and highly volatile, akin to "tech options." In the first round impact of inflation expectations and interest rate repricing, they are sold off as a natural extension of the interest rate trade. However, if the impacts on Hormozgan ultimately solidify into a longer-term energy-driven inflation memory, narratives about fiat currency purchasing power erosion may once again rise to the surface, then the "digital gold" and "currency depreciation hedge" labels will return to BTC's pricing framework, becoming the most significant narrative grab for medium to long-term allocations to re-enter the market.
Dollar and Treasury Volatility Increases, Crypto Becomes the Sandwich Layer
When U.S. Central Command clearly defined this round of strikes as a response to Iran's "unprovoked acts of aggression," and elevated it as part of the narrative concerning dollar sovereignty and military advantage, global capital instinctively tends to gravitate toward "U.S. assets." In the first few days after the risk was repriced, historical templates are often similar: similar to the early stages of the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the initial outbreak of the pandemic, the dollar index first strengthens, U.S. treasuries are bought as safe-haven anchors, while stocks, commodities, and high Beta assets are collectively sold off and reevaluated. In such scenarios, BTC and ETH, priced in dollars, inherently find themselves in the non-dollar risk asset sequence, subject to valuation discounts from a strengthening dollar and facing dual pressures from global capital flowing back to U.S. treasuries and de-leveraging from the market, resulting in amplified price volatility rather than dilution.
What truly determines the extent to which this round of shocks can suppress crypto is how high oil prices and inflation expectations will be heightened by the risks surrounding Hormozgan. Once the market begins to pay risk premiums for "energy-driven inflation," the game over the Fed's subsequent rate path will quickly intensify: whether nominal interest rates need to stay elevated for longer, and will real rates rise again, directly determines the discount rates for assets like BTC and ETH that have no cash flows—high interest rate and high real interest rate combinations historically compress their valuation space; conversely, as soon as geopolitical and growth pressures accumulate to prompt the market to bet again on future easing and on the apex of dollar and treasury yields, crypto will shift back from a sold-off risk asset to a highly elastic target in "liquidity trading." This sandwich position between offline dollar safe-haven flows and future easing expectations makes tracking the strength of the dollar and the path of real interest rates more crucial in the short term than any single on-chain indicator.
Preservation of Funds or Speculation? The Pull Between USDT and BTC
In this intense geopolitical conflict with direct military confrontation between the U.S. and Iran, the initial reaction of funds is usually not to seek "who is the safe-haven asset," but rather to ensure leverage survival first. In contract markets, highly leveraged positions in BTC and ETH are often subject to being forcefully liquidated during the first wave of severe volatility, amplifying technical sell-offs, and spot transactions also passively reduce positions, presenting a typical risk unloading structure of "price drops + increased demand for dollar assets." Correspondingly, on-chain funding tends to favor dollar cash positions and dollar-pegged assets, preferring to shelter in USDT, USDC, types of "chips pegged to the dollar," waiting for the first wave of the shock to pass before deciding whether to re-bet.
In terms of geographical exposure, this round of strikes is closely tied to the Strait of Hormuz, involving significant oil revenues and dollar settlements. If local capital accounts perceive escalating sanctions, backend risks of the banking system or local currency fluctuations, historical patterns indicate that behaviors to hedge against currency and bank risks with on-chain dollars, such as USDT, are more likely to emerge in the region, similar to the paths local investors used to transfer and store value using on-chain dollars during the Russia-Ukraine conflict and certain emerging market currency crises. Next, crypto funds will likely follow that familiar "three-stage" process: first clearing risk positions to on-chain dollars amid forced liquidations and spontaneous de-leveraging; then assessing whether to increase hedge assets as the market re-prices oil risk premiums, inflation expectations, and interest rate paths; finally, when the conflict is perceived as a catalyst for long-term inflation and currency depreciation, some on-chain dollars will flow back into BTC to reaffirm the "digital gold" narrative. Thus, whether this time the relationship between USDT and BTC leans towards "preservation" or shifts back to "speculation" will crucially depend on the market's judgment regarding the persistence of U.S.-Iran conflict and the intensity of the inflation chain.
The Flames of War Still Burn, Three Lines for Traders to Focus On
As the U.S. and Iran transition from proxy conflicts to direct military confrontations, the flames of war reaching Hormozgan Province effectively reshuffle the pricing chain of "Oil - Inflation - Dollar - Interest Rates": as long as there is a possibility of escalation or prolongation of the conflict, risk premiums in oil and shipping costs, and military spending expectations in various countries will be pushed upward by the market, thereby increasing global nominal interest rates and discount rates, continuously putting pressure on the valuations of high Beta assets like BTC and ETH. For crypto traders in the coming weeks or even months, the key points to monitor are three lines: the first is the rhythm of the conflict and the path of escalation—whether the two rounds of U.S. strikes can "cap" at the current level, or whether Iranian missile and drone retaliations will lead to further retaliation, determining the duration of the geopolitical risk premium at elevated levels; the second is energy and inflation expectations—if the tensions near Hormozgan are perceived as the new normal, the market will incorporate higher and longer inflation expectations into the interest rate curve, compressing the valuation space of growth and crypto assets; the third is the global funds' rebalancing between dollar assets, on-chain dollars, and BTC/ETH—one side driven by risk aversion towards de-leveraging and flowing towards the dollar and treasuries, the other side driven by some regional investors seeking to hedge against local currency and capital control risks, moving funds to on-chain dollars or further betting on "digital gold." Ultimately, which force prevails will determine whether this round of shocks merely results in a severe price volatility cleansing of the crypto pricing system or leads to a long-lasting rewrite of the pricing paradigm.
Join our community, let's discuss and grow stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
