From Bitget's Reality, a Ten-Year Three-Wave of Stock Tokenization: An Incomplete Financial Exploration

CN
链捕手
Follow
23 days ago

Author: Jarvis

On May 26, 2026, Bitget launched its RWA platform Reality, officially introducing the tokenized product rToken into the market. On the same day, the "Innovation Exemption" regulatory sandbox originally set to be launched by the SEC was urgently shelved. Just two months prior, Nasdaq had just received approval from the SEC, with native tokenized stocks set to officially go online in Q3 2026.

These three events occurring simultaneously in the same time window is no coincidence.

This article is not a product review, nor is it a promotional piece extolling the imminent explosion of U.S. stock tokenization. What we aim to do is to use Reality as the latest entry point to trace back the true history of ten years and three waves of stock tokenization—who died, how they died, who survived, and what they survived on—and then condense this history into a framework that can be used to evaluate the present and the future.

If you only want to know whether Reality can be used, please skip to Chapter Three.

If you want to truly understand this matter, please start from the beginning.

Introduction: May 26, 2026, a Slice of an Era

May 26, 2026, an ordinary Tuesday.

In the afternoon of that day, Bitget officially announced the launch of its RWA platform Reality. The wording of the release materials was quite grand: "We did something that might make Wall Street a bit nervous. The total market value of global U.S. stocks is $125 trillion, with a tokenization penetration rate of 0.01%—what does this mean?"

On the same day, the crypto media Phemex issued an inconspicuous news announcement: The "Innovation Exemption" sandbox originally intended for launch by the SEC this week has been urgently postponed, with no new timeline.

The background of this news is: SEC Chairman Paul Atkins had publicly stated weeks prior that the exemption framework was "coming soon," but at the last moment, Nasdaq, NYSE, and Cboe jointly pressured the SEC, insisting that any tokenized securities trading must fall under the existing National Market System (NMS) regulatory framework, rather than circumventing it through regulatory exemptions. The three major traditional exchanges intercepted the momentum for regulatory relaxation.

Looking back two months earlier, on March 18, 2026, the SEC formally approved Nasdaq's tokenized securities trading rules (Release No. 34-105047), allowing stocks in the Russell 1000 index and major ETFs to trade in tokenized form on Nasdaq, sharing the same order book, having the same execution priority, and the same shareholder rights as traditional stocks, settled through a pilot project with DTCC (the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation) in the U.S. The first transaction is expected to occur in Q3 2026.

Together, these three events constitute a brilliant slice of an era:

On one side, Bitget Reality enters the scene with the banner of "allowing novice retail investors access to U.S. stocks," while on the other side, traditional financial giants successfully restrain any relaxed exemptions for tokenized products within the SEC, and Nasdaq has already begun constructing a "regular army" channel connecting traditional finance and blockchain.

Reality stands at an extremely special historical coordinate: It is not the starting point of this revolution, nor may it be the endpoint, but it is the furthest step taken thus far in terms of technical integrity and user experience in the entire track. To understand it, one must first understand what it stands upon.

Chapter One: Three Waves in Ten Years—The Path of Stock Tokenization

Why Talk About History?

In the crypto industry, "talking about history" is often seen as a waste of time—because everything is changing at an exponential rate, and the past seems unimportant.

But stock tokenization is an exception.

The history of this field spans less than a decade, but every failure within it points to different variations of the same underlying issues. If you do not understand these failures, you cannot judge whether today's products are merely repeating past mistakes or genuinely taking a step forward.

免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。

Share To
APP

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink