This week in Eastern Standard Time, the Economic Development Committee of the Brazilian House of Representatives began reviewing a draft that has ignited global discussions in the cryptocurrency and macroeconomic circles—the Bitcoin Sovereign Strategic Reserve Bill RESbit/RESBit (Bill No. 4501/2024). The most impactful proposal in the draft is to accumulate up to 1 million bitcoins within five years, a groundbreaking initiative at the sovereign level that vastly exceeds previous proposals suggesting only 5% of foreign exchange reserves be used for bitcoin purchases. As the legislative discussion began, the London-listed company Gem Resources increased its holdings by purchasing 9 bitcoins at an average price of $70,355.56, while Coinbase's stock surged 7.41% in pre-market trading, starkly contrasting with its recently disclosed $667 million loss. The immediate response from micro-level treasury and capital markets added dramatic tension to the narrative of "national treasury betting on bitcoin."
One Million in Five Years: Brazil's Radical Bet
● Leap in Target Volume: This bill proposes to accumulate up to 1 million bitcoins within five years, which is far more radical than Brazil’s previous proposal of merely "using 5% of foreign exchange reserves to purchase bitcoin," both in terms of absolute scale and time frame. The old proposal remained at the level of asset diversification and experimentation, while the new plan sets a firm target akin to "stockpiling a mine," pushing bitcoin from the margins to the center of sovereign asset portfolios and sending a stark policy signal.
● Symbolic Significance for Major Economies: As a leading economy in Latin America and an important BRICS member, Brazil would become the first major economy to include bitcoin in its sovereign reserves if this bill passes and is executed. Unlike experiments by smaller nations, this means bitcoin would be systematically included in the narrative of a country's substantial and complex financial balance sheet for the first time, with symbolic significance that far surpasses mere asset price fluctuations; it resembles a public "rewrite proposal" to the current international monetary system.
● Proportion and Narrative Impact: The total supply of bitcoin, its circulating supply, and the proportion held long-term determine the high scarcity and symbolic discourse of this figure of 1 million on the supply side. Even if Brazil does not reach the upper limit, the mere imagination of "a national level potential buyer and lockup" is enough to amplify price elasticity globally, reinforcing the narrative of "countries scrambling to acquire and tightened supply," infusing the bitcoin narrative with a sovereign premium imagination that traverses cycles.
● Uncertainty in the Review Stage: It is essential to remain calm, as the bill is currently only in the Economic Development Committee of the House of Representatives, with no public schedule for review or probability assessment for passage, nor specific explanations on funding sources or execution mechanisms. In the absence of disclosures regarding critical terms, pathways, and political maneuvering, any interpretation treating "1 million" as a predetermined plan oversimplifies the uncertainty, which readers should view as a high-energy narrative rather than an established reality.
Tax Rumors and Exemptions: The Imagination and Discrepancy of Institutional Benefits
● Sources and Credibility of Rumors: Surrounding RESbit/4501/2024, there is market circulation that the bill may allow taxes to be paid in bitcoin and exempt bitcoin capital gains from taxation; however, current information comes from a single channel and is labeled as low credibility in briefings. There are currently no official texts or authoritative versions public, and relevant interpretations seem more like a piece of imaginary puzzle about "sovereign reserves + tax incentives," requiring investors to be particularly restrained when retelling and quoting.
● Reconstructing Tax Payment Scenarios: If Brazil's tax system does open up the option to pay taxes in bitcoin, it will directly change the asset usage pathways for individuals and businesses—from book assets to a liquid medium with "taxable capacity." For companies, bitcoin would no longer merely represent a on-balance-sheet position or a hedging tool but could enter cash flow management and tax planning logic; for individuals, holding coins and declaration behaviors would also be reintegrated into the tax compliance framework, potentially enhancing the willingness to hold bitcoin "in the sunlight."
● Leverage Effect of Capital Gains Exemptions: If partial or full exemptions on capital gains tax become a reality, they will significantly attract cross-border capital inflows, family wealth migration, and high-net-worth asset allocation. The preferential tax treatment of bitcoin gains will create a stark contrast with traditional financial tools' income tax, driving some capital from local stocks, bonds, and real estate towards crypto assets, and might also lead to conflicts with existing tax bases and fiscal revenue targets, triggering a tussle between domestic vested interests and regulatory bodies.
● Forward-Looking Projections and Real Boundaries: It must be emphasized that related tax clauses have not been publicly disclosed, and regulatory bodies and the finance department have yet to provide clear explanations. Discussions around "tax payments" and "tax exemptions" are better viewed as forward-looking projections of institutional possibilities rather than as pre-established policies. For traders and long-term holders, viewing tax benefits as a certainty for substantial bets during this text-less phase poses a far greater risk than opportunity.
National Treasury and Listed Companies: Aligned Bets in Macro and Micro
● Details of Gem Resources' Increase: While the national-level bill ignites discussions, the London-listed company Gem Resources has provided its micro-level asset allocation vote—purchasing 9 bitcoins at an average price of $70,355.56. This transaction, though not significantly large, continues its notion of "viewing bitcoin as a reserve asset": gradually building a position rather than making a one-time gamble, allowing for time-dispersed price volatility, which makes bitcoin feel more like "digital gold" than a speculative chip.
● Contrast Between Micro Treasury and Sovereign Chips: Placing Gem Resources' increase alongside Brazil's potential 1 million sovereign reserve accumulation reveals the differences in betting and constraints between actors of differing scales on the same asset. Corporate treasuries focus more on financial statement fluctuations, shareholder tolerance, and accounting standards, while national treasuries must balance sovereign credit, foreign exchange stability, and political accountability. The former is a "cautious tester," while the latter, once executed, is a "systemic bet," but both reinforce bitcoin's narrative as a reserve asset.
● Convergence of Institutional Narrative: From corporate balance sheets to national reserve levels, bitcoin is increasingly regarded by various entities as an asset category "capable of institutional holding." Companies like Gem Resources resonate with discussions on sovereign reserves, making "digital reserve assets" no longer merely an internal language for retail investors and crypto-native institutions, but gradually accepted by traditional finance and listed company boards, helping to break the single label of "bitcoin = speculative product" and creating a narrative foundation for more institutions to include it in their allocation in the future.
● Market Psychology and Demonstrative Effects: When both macro and micro entities increase their holdings in the same direction, even with vastly different scales, it amplifies market psychology. The case of Gem Resources' increase serves as a demonstration of "this is doable" for other small and medium-sized listed companies, family offices, and fund managers; meanwhile, Brazil's sovereign reserve discussion encourages investors to reassess the long-term supply-demand structure and ceiling expectations of bitcoin on a higher dimensional level, pushing both retail and institutional investors to connect emotionally and in their allocations.
Coinbase's Surge and Massive Losses: Capitalization of Institutional Benefits
● Price and Fundamental Discrepancy: As discussions around the Brazilian bill and sovereign narrative heat up, Coinbase's stock rose 7.41% in pre-market trading, while it recently disclosed a $667 million loss in its earnings report. This dataset presents a stark contrast: corporate earnings pressure did not deter aggressive buying in the secondary market, indicating that the current pricing logic has clearly transcended short-term profits and is more aligned with "option-like bets" on industry institutionalization trends.
● Early Bets on the Institutionalization Process: The market widely interprets Coinbase's pre-market surge as a preemptive reaction to "bitcoin institutionalization and sovereign adoption expectations." As a leading compliant trading platform in the United States, Coinbase is seen as a "leveraged asset" in crypto infrastructure: every news bit about sovereign reserves, ETF expansions, or regulatory clarifications is magnified in its valuation. Even though Brazil's sovereign reserve imagination is distanced from U.S. regulatory realities, it is still priced as part of the global institutionalization chain.
● Displacement of Emotion and Profit Models: In the short term, the volatility of Coinbase's stock reflects more the risk appetite and liquidity sentiment—while there are expectations for increased trading volume of bitcoin and leading assets, platform stocks can gain a high elastic premium despite earnings pressure; in the long term, what truly determines its value remains the fee structure, compliance costs, product diversification, and regulatory maneuvering. The reason it is still sought after amid a $667 million loss is that the market sees it as a representative of the "crypto institutionalization index," not merely a story around a single earnings report.
● Weight of Sovereign Expectations in Capital Pricing: The Brazilian bill and similar policy discussions primarily play the role of catalysts for emotional and valuation amplification in the capital markets, rather than direct cash flow variables. In the short term, such narratives can easily trigger excess rises in crypto concept stocks and related assets, but if the bill's progress does not meet expectations, terms are significantly reduced, or global regulatory winds turn cooler, the emotional retraction may also lead to severe corrections. Investors pursuing institutional benefits must leave a safety cushion for "expectations not meeting imaginations."
Ambitions Behind Sovereign Reserves: Shadows of the Dollar System and Multipolar Currency Expectations
● Brazil's Attempts in the Context of De-dollarization: Placing Brazil's envisioning of a bitcoin sovereign reserve within a longer timeline reveals its implicit connections with discussions on de-dollarization and multipolar currency systems. As one of the emerging economies that has long been dissatisfied with dollar hegemony, Brazil is attempting to weaken reliance on a single currency through multifaceted approaches like energy, commodities, regional cooperation, and digital assets; the bitcoin sovereign reserve is seen as an addition to the traditional foreign exchange reserve structure, providing a fragment of hedge "not controlled by a single sovereign."
● Touching Sensitive Levels of National Balance Sheets: Compared to some countries that merely introduce crypto assets within regulatory frameworks, payment settlements, or pilot projects, if Brazil includes bitcoin in its sovereign reserves, it will directly impact the structure and volatility characteristics of the national balance sheet. This is not just technological or payment innovation, but rather embedding high-volatility digital assets into the core levels of currency and finance, touching the most sensitive indicators of central banks, finance ministries, and international partners, which will provoke more complex risk discussions within domestic and international regulatory and financial circles.
● Potential Responses from Traditional Finance and Rating Agencies: Traditional financial institutions and international rating agencies generally prefer reserve assets that are predictable, liquid, and relatively controllable in volatility when assessing sovereign credit and exchange rate expectations. If bitcoin is substantially included in reserves, it may be perceived by some institutions as an "increased proportion of risk assets," thus offering more conservative judgments in rating outlooks, financing costs, and capital flow expectations; some institutions may also view it as a diversification attempt of traditional reserve structures, with attitudes not entirely one-sided.
● Caution Regarding “Systemic Conflict” Narratives: Currently, there are no systematic statements from high-level Brazilian officials on this bill in public channels, nor is there a clear response from the IMF or rating agencies and other international organizations. In a phase of severe information asymmetry, simply rendering it as a positive conflict of “against the dollar system” not only exaggerates the reality but can also be exploited by emotional narratives. A more prudent approach is to view this as an exploration to seek diversification of chips within the existing system's gaps rather than the point that has already torn apart the old order.
The Legislative Game is Not Over: The Imagining and Realization of Bitcoin as a National Chip
The Brazilian sovereign reserve bill, the micro-increase by Gem Resources, and Coinbase's stock surge amidst massive losses collectively piece together a new narrative layer transitioning bitcoin from a "high-volatility asset" to a "national-grade chip": on one end, discussions are underway to write it into treasury assets, while on the other end, listed companies and capital markets regard it as a proxy target in the institutionalization process, intertwining micro and macro timelines.
However, from the perspective of realistic advancement, key details such as bill review timelines, funding sources for purchases, and tax clause designs still remain absent, appearing more like a "dress rehearsal market" of price and emotion prior to institutional establishment. The market is prepricing potential upcoming sovereign buying and tax incentives, but the institutional game has yet to enter a quantifiable realization phase; there exists a wide gap between narrative and reality.
If Brazil ultimately becomes the first “crabs-eating” major economy, potential follow-up paths for other medium-sized countries and resource-based economies will mainly revolve around "partial reserve diversification," "specific fund or sovereign fund pilot projects," and "regional settlement experiments," with their demonstrative effect more reflected in “bitcoin could enter the national asset discussion list” rather than an impulsive replication of the 1 million numeric target.
For investors, what truly needs to be grasped is the distance between institutional expectations and realistic realization: when pursuing "sovereign narrative benefits," ample safety margins must be left for legislative games, political variables, and international feedback, understanding that prices often run ahead of institutions, and institutions do not necessarily land in the direction preset by prices. Only by embracing imagination while being vigilant against pullbacks and reversals can one strive to stand on the proactive side in this narrative revolving around national treasuries and digital chips.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX welfare group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance welfare group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
