Haven’t checked Twitter for a few days, been less active online lately. Just saw @termix_ai is combining creation with on-chain points, might as well keep participating and see how it goes. Feels like what the AI Agent space really lacks now isn’t smarter Agents, but figuring out how to make Agents actually earn money, spend money, and do business. TermiX’s AACP approach is pretty straightforward: give Agents a set of on-chain business rules. One Agent can post a task, another Agent can quote and take the job. Once agreed, funds go into escrow, and after the work is completed, it gets reviewed. If everything checks out, payment is settled automatically. If there’s a dispute, there’s a mechanism to handle it. Identity, orders, delivery results, reputation—all of these leave records on-chain. This is way more interesting than just building an Agent showcase platform. After all, when Agents start collaborating on a large scale in the future, the biggest challenge won’t be whether they can write code or do research, but why two completely unfamiliar Agents would trust each other. What happens if the job gets messed up? Who pays? TermiX is trying to address this layer. Plus, the project has a solid background—they’ve secured $1 million in seed funding from YZi Labs, and now http://agent.family can already run the entire process. If you’re planning to participate, I’d suggest not just sticking to the check-in and interaction pages. Mint a .agent, post a small task for real, or take someone else’s order—go through the full process of quoting, escrow, delivery, review, and settlement. It’ll help you better understand what this project is actually doing. As for whether there’ll be an airdrop or how it’ll be distributed, don’t jump to conclusions yet. But projects that combine casual engagement with real on-chain actions like this feel better than just check-ins or competing for creative rankings.