When chatting with some friends about who to follow for MEME trades, the feedback was: 'That J guy? He claims a 100% win rate, do you really believe him?' 'This J posts so many trades—does he really have that much money to jump into every single one?' Makes sense when you think about it. ———————————— In the era of AI and advanced photo editing, trade screenshots can be edited, portfolios can be faked, profits can be fabricated, and even 'I said this back then' can be made up. So, the rarest thing now might not be how accurate someone’s predictions are, but rather: What did they actually say in the past, and what really happened afterward? ———————————— This is why I found @astros_ag’s Alpha Network so interesting recently: It turns public market opinions into verifiable historical records, and builds a person’s market reputation over time based on actual outcomes. After all, when everyone can Photoshop themselves into a 'trading guru,' what you’ve truly been validated by the market for is the hardest thing to fake.