When the market is one-sided, the biggest fear is not looking in the wrong direction, but fighting between long and short lines in one account. Now, Bitget has launched a sub account function for CFD, which solves this big problem I often encounter this headache when trading: On the one hand, I want to keep a bottom line and follow the trend, but on the other hand, I can't resist doing intraday trading. One needs patience to hold onto, and the other needs to fast in and out. As long as these two sets of logic are stuck in the same MT5 account, the question at the end is usually not 'will we fight', but 'when will we fight'. The most common is closing positions. Short term traders are quick to handle tasks as soon as they see their target position; But there are still trend positions in the same account, and once operational habits, order management, or EA logic are mixed together, it is easy to take away positions that should not have been moved. Once the situation has moved forward, chasing after it will be a completely different transaction. I later realized that what was more troublesome than misoperation was actually reviewing. At the end of the month, pull out the records and mix all short-term, short-term, and trial positions into one statement. Whether the account is making money or losing money can certainly be seen, but which strategy is contributing and which strategy is lagging behind actually needs to be dismantled one by one. Over time, it is easy to only focus on the total net worth, and it is unclear whether the strategy itself has failed. So now I prefer to straighten out the account structure first After seeing the sub account function of Bitget CFD, it can truly separate the two sets of trading logic. I plan to use it this way: the main account will hold positions with longer periods, and the sub account will run intraday or higher frequency strategies separately. Two independent MT5 accounts, each with its own position, margin, and net worth. How to enter and exit the account within the day, without mixing up orders from long-term accounts. After doing so, many things became simpler. When closing a position, there is no need to repeatedly confirm whether this order is a bottom position; When reviewing, there is no need to manually label hundreds of transactions. Which strategy has been in a bad state recently can be judged by looking at one's net worth curve. There is another change that I didn't pay much attention to before: floating losses in long-term positions, so as not to directly affect intraday accounts with emotions; Continuous stop loss within the day, and will not casually move trend orders that should have been held. After separating accounts, discipline becomes easier to maintain. The earlier you do account isolation, the easier it will be, which is very necessary If you only run one strategy, one account is certainly sufficient. But as long as we start working on band, intraday, EA, or testing strategies simultaneously, I would recommend breaking them apart first. Not to appear professional, but to see clearly what each strategy is actually doing in the future. The sub accounts of Bitget CFD can be linked to the same main account, and there is no need to repeat the identity authentication process when creating them. Funds can also be transferred internally between the main account and the sub account. For me, the value lies in these few words: when I want to isolate, I don't need to tinker with a new account system. The transaction itself is already complex enough, there is no need for the account structure to create noise for itself. Are you currently using one strategy and one account, or are you running a mix of several strategies? If we were to split the profits and losses of each strategy at the end of the month, could you tell at a glance now? Why not try Bitget CFD's sub account management @Bitget_zh @GracyBitget