I realized one thing: what I am researching in DeFi is no longer about profits, but about when the project team will change the rules. As soon as you understand the gameplay, the parameters change; Just as you calculated the profits, the structure of the pool moved. It's not your judgment that's wrong, it's the instability of the rules themselves. So when I look at the project now, the first sentence I ask is: Can this thing be changed randomly? It was also in this mindset that I began to observe @ LoopFinace_Ssc. I first threw 5000u to test the water myself. It is now a timed rush and not very friendly to lazy people. Small funds can experience it, but large funds must complete the background tuning themselves. My first impression of Loop was not whether it could take off, but that it had a lot of rules. Budget, allocation, repurchase, and destruction are all written into the contract, The team itself does not have the authority to make changes, and both power and money are locked on the chain. The code has also undergone a complete audit. Now Loop has DEX, staking, and farming, LOOP is more like a certificate of equity, managed by DAO, capable of generating and being continuously repurchased and destroyed. More importantly, the sysfi derivative platform behind it: Users save money, agreements earn money, Profit will be automatically repurchased and LOOP will be destroyed according to the contract, Don't rely on subsidies to forcefully attract TVL, but instead make the national treasury thicker and the circulation less. Whether it can be achieved or not is another matter. But in a DeFi environment where rules can be changed at any time, This kind of project that first writes down rules and locks up power is at least worth putting on the observation list. I am observing Loop Finance. Not because it promises huge profits, But it made me realize again: In DeFi, stable rules are inherently valuable. Portal: https://(loopsdao. com)/bindAddress? code=T4P0LHJY