Investment is always like this, it requires both seeing right and doing right I have been optimistic about the Bonk fun ecosystem for a long time. Pump fun needs to release coins, and the money earned from Pump fun will not stay in the ecosystem, causing crazy attacks within the community. New Launchpads are bound to emerge to gain more market share. Bonk was one of the most likely Launchpads to emerge at the time, and there were only a few options available from the ecological standards. But the Bonk fun ecosystem still took a long time to establish, and the market only agreed with this logic when Pump fun was about to release coins. I'm thinking that at that time, the car was too heavy, and the ecology needed to rely on benchmarks and leaders to bring wealth effects. USELESS was too expensive at the time, without deep washing, and most people were not in the car. When USELESS fell to 5 million later, Bonk guy continued to build and there was no more leading Meme in the ecosystem. The market felt that the profit and loss ratio was good. Investment still needs to identify the core logic of buying at that time. The logic remains unchanged, and the market's refusal to buy may only be due to a lack of agreement with the current price, which requires a round of consolidation. The players who originally scanned the chain either lost everything or rested freely, and the difficulty of scanning the chain increased, causing the bot's data to decline significantly. The areas with wealth effects in the future are likely to shift from the first stage to the second stage, and investors are more inclined towards projects with high profit and loss ratios and high certainty. Pay more attention to opportunities in the second paragraph and focus on targets that have communities and soulful individuals for continuous development. I am such a useless waste. When I believe in the wind, I am useless. During the peak period of Bonk fun, I was on Launchcoin. 🤡