Let me say a few words about OKx's recent compliance issues Previously, I had a lot of dealings with various compliance departments in Australia regarding the application for a digital banking license. At that time, the company also recruited many high paying compliance professionals to handle this matter, so I had some experience. How to put it, actually compliance is somewhat unlimited. If you want to be strict, you can be strict to the death, so strict that few normal users can survive, because you can always pick out some mistakes. And since compliance professionals earn high salaries, they cannot demonstrate the value of this salary without demonstrating some professional qualities. Especially when facing conflicts with the business department, being impartial and impartial, the more iron one is, the more they can demonstrate their professionalism and importance. I can understand @ star_okx's determination to sacrifice everything for the listing of OKx, even if there is a slight obstacle, it is not allowed to appear, even if it is a mistake of killing three thousand, not a single one will be spared. So even though there has been a lot of public outrage lately, I haven't let go, but have been pushing users to accept it. But I also want to mention a soft reminder: We cannot fully trust the opinions of the compliance department, otherwise we may overcompensate, the business department may not be able to do anything, and users may also rebel and leave on a large scale. As a result, compliance personnel will not care. So the degree to which this compliance standard is grasped actually depends on the boss's thoughts and the depth of the compliance department's influence on the boss. To be fair, Star's statement that "retail loans are not allowed for cryptocurrency speculation" has sparked a strong backlash, but in fact, it is impossible to say that this is allowed in public 😂 。 If no one asks, it's okay. You specifically asked @ star_okx to respond to loan speculation, how could he not firmly deny it? Otherwise, wouldn't it be like stepping on a thunderbolt? Avoiding high-risk, low tolerance users engaging in financial investments, especially using financial derivatives, is a basic requirement at the compliance level. In Australia, if you want to play contracts, you must first pass the "Appropriateness Test", verify your capital (either have a net worth of 2.5M, an annual income of AUD 250000 for 2 years, or have multiple investment experiences of AUD 50000 or more), and then spend money to obtain a certificate issued by a certified public accountant. Countrymen KYC has always been taking advantage of this area. It is easy to start with a hundred times contract, which is the light of lax compliance. Of course, this area is expected to be gradually tightened in the future. So this will greatly benefit Perpdex. Do you know why @ cz-binance values @ Aster_deX so much and why so many Perpdex are causing headaches and bleeding? Because this is a future trend.