After countless calls, it came out! After experiencing various "doubts" from the community, Virtual officials also responded. I have to say that this wave of reaction is quite fast. Please interpret the tweet according to your own understanding. Firstly, there is a possibility for project parties to obtain high scores through project tokens. Combined with the situation where lower market capitalization leads to more points, it can be inferred that inactive project parties may gain more. In a sense, truth is biased. The first reaction to the incident was to have the project team disclose the developer's holdings. This self verification process inevitably leads to new "doubts". What is the status of some suspicious transactions through tapping and entering if the wallet is not self verified. Whether there is no presumption of guilt or a one size fits all approach also tests Virtual's management team. After all, it's not difficult to "witch" a certain address. Obtain corresponding points for open positions on the project platform. If not made public, the project will no longer receive points. Presumably, most of them can provide Dev wallets. The difficulty in resolving this issue is how to identify the authenticity of Dev wallets and the actual flow of funds. The most important way to convince the community is to let community members know. Which project parties failed to disclose Dev wallets in a timely manner, allowing users to "avoid pitfalls". Stay away from bad Dev and pledge high transparency Dev. A small step for Virtual, a big step for community fairness! For all Vader Yapping, it is worth noting that the VADER ranking has already been launched and can be found on the community website. I also took a quick look at the rankings this morning, and it has to be said that they are very user-friendly for new users. Many users' fans have not actually surpassed 1000, and some have not even surpassed 100. The rankings are all in the top 100 of Vader Yapping, and the common factor is that they have repeatedly discussed @ VaderyAI_, basically achieving non-stop chatter. Although there aren't many views, the current mechanism is that as long as you mention enough, you will definitely make it to the list 🤣 The proportion of the top 100 minds is mostly above 0.2%. The good news for brothers is that they can copy homework, at least when it is not optimized in the short term, they can 'roll it up'. Although the calculation factors of Mingpai are shown in the following figure, there are still some differences at present. If you want to challenge VADER Yapping's ranking, you can seize this time window and make the most of it within the current time frame. After all, the actions of the people on the list are basically obvious, and those with a large user fan interaction base have the ability to seize the opportunity. For the later optimization, based on past experience, it will definitely be done. The current strategy should be to increase the volume in the early stage and improve the quality in the later stage. Ensure your own advantages as much as possible. At present, I am not on the list myself, and I also plan to try driving a dash 🤣 I hope everyone shows mercy