After posting that day, you all asked me how many more accounts @ Aster_deX had on? ——Just one. I didn't make up for 20 additional episodes because I came up with the word 'false prosperity'. Last year, there was a project called @ aevoxyz. In the first phase of the original drop task, I logged into dozens of accounts, with only 30000 people and low trading volume. Later, a farm activity was launched, with a bunch of KOLs posting articles every day to attract people to participate. I initially estimated the total transaction volume of the activity to be 5 billion, but unexpectedly it ended up being over 100 billion. (You can search aevo from: greta0086 to see). The final result is obvious - those who brush the original drops all make money, while those who engage in farm activities mostly lose money. Aster has a lot of trading moisture and is a clear phenomenon of "false prosperity" on the chain, just like Binance Alpha's "false prosperity", without fundamental support. Even if Aster's daily trading volume has reached a quarter of Hyper's, it will plummet after airdrop. I think when it comes to airdrops, we must be wary of "false prosperity", even including various online platforms that create "false prosperity" for major projects on Twitter. Even a completely unpopular project can be hyped up by a bunch of KOLs. The most representative one is @ stayloudio, which makes it impossible for novice fans to screen projects. Rubbing randomly - it's KOLs using their reputation to create false prosperity and monetize fan traffic.