LAYER textbook style operation I have been traveling recently and haven't had much time to delve into things, so most of the things are just "skipped" and I haven't thought about them carefully. Through the attention grabbing trend of @ solayer_1abs, I can only say that I didn't have any food to eat at all. I just want to emphasize the importance of following the trend. ---------- 🌟 Have long-term short sellers really made money? After seeing the drop, a bunch of friends started congratulating those who started shorting 1u, not knowing if it was a "goodwill" concern or a "yin-yang" concern, after all, in the long run, it is difficult to understand how to carry a 2-month order? In the long run, there is a high probability of winning by short selling casually, which is related to returns. After all, the profit of going long ∞ means the risk ∞, while the limited profit of going short means the risk is limited. Of course, this is just a literal situation. In reality, going long can result in a maximum loss, while going short can result in a loss of infinity. After all, risk and profit are directly proportional. In the cryptocurrency industry, 99.99% of projects are zero, so the risk of short selling is extremely low in the long run, so many people blindly short. But is it really not afraid of encountering a project team that is "strong for life", just to keep pulling bids? The recent few who opened without any imagination can only be said to have average odds and require a relatively long period of time, whether it's the layer KAITO BABY. Of course, you can say that in the long run, the package will return to zero, but I cannot argue with you. After all, in the long run, I don't know if you are talking about 1 year or 234567, but it is always reasonable. I can only say not to empty BTC, you can play whatever else you want, I don't understand either, after all, being a long knockoff will result in a complete loss in this round!!! ----------- 🌟 Predictable opportunities on the right, seize the opportunity Why do I say this wave is textbook style? Because overall, if you look at the simplest thing, it's the layer rate. On Tuesday, it suddenly started to become -%, and Bybit quickly changed it to charge for 1 hour. And soon the layer rate reached its peak at -2%. This only happened on the first day of the opening, when everyone was at Fud's moment. Many people go against the trend and think that if the rate is negative, they will start to go long. This is the operation of group friend Bob. When the rate keeps rising, he calls us to go all the way empty. When the rate drops to -2%, he calls us to eat and take, but the plane crashes 🤣。 The only thing I didn't expect was that the layer could plummet by 70% in just two days, which is the biggest problem. However, anyway, most people only dare to eat for a short distance, and there aren't many that can be eaten from the mountaintop. After all, they initially thought that a -2% rate could sustain them for several days, but ended up finishing work in one day. At that time, when I saw the rate of -2%, I could imagine who was "sparing no effort" in short selling. It must be the people who had been "sparing no effort" in long selling before who dared to do so, right? ---------- 🌟 Short selling without stop loss is like jumping on a grave Brothers, we only see short sellers who eat meat and drink soup, but we really haven't seen short sellers who get beaten up. Leaving it at a distance, let's take ALPACA as an example. The grass on the graves of the short sellers has not yet grown to a height of 3 meters. Further away, the previous round of short selling BTC started with a fixed investment of 15000 and the group disappeared at 19000 🤣。 After all, when shorting, unless you roll out your position, even if you return to zero, you can only earn the principal you shorted, and the loss is infinite, but infinity is just a "visual metaphor". Have you ever heard of someone who makes a fortune by selling empty stocks, or someone who only sells empty stocks without selling them? (Of course, the risk of rolling over inventory is extremely high) If you short and double your price, you lose 100%; if you double your price, you lose 200%; if you double your price, you lose 1000%; if you go down to zero, you earn 100%, and it's difficult to go back to zero 😂。 So you don't stop loss because you think there is a high chance of winning, but can you look directly at the "loss amount"? 👿 Assuming you are short 10 million and want to make 1 million, and then lose 10 million, what will you do? What will you do if you lose 20 million, and what will you do if you lose 30 million? 🐱 Of course, you would say that you have unlimited margin. If you lose 100wu, would you think that just to make 1000u, I would lose 100wu? Am I really stupid? Of course, if I use BTC as an example, it would be offensive, after all, there is no other cryptocurrency that has been pulling stocks all the way like it 🤣。 If you are willing to do business for 1000u and lose 100wu, then do it. I won't do it anyway. So the teacher who shorted always wins, after all, he can carry orders infinitely. When he carries them to the end, he tells everyone that he has won, and then pulls up the rate to see that he has lost 500% of his principal (refer to ALPACA)