This story is just getting crazier and crazier. From what I'm seeing, both Movement Labs and Movement Foundation have used the same market maker, in writing, to pump and dump a significant portion of their token supply. In writing! Movement is arguing that it was a victim in this situation, but its name appears to be on both of these contracts, correct? Can someone explain if there is any ambiguity left? Great reporting @skesslr and @CoinDesk