Asking Binance Again: Since it's a dictatorship, why bother with cosplay? Since we want the community to cooperate in acting, why bother trying to cover it up A large amount of new evidence suggests that this is a systemic purge led by the Binance and Pancake teams, which has been meticulously orchestrated, calculated for benefits, and suppressed for power. After three consecutive questioning articles, Binance continued to remain silent. It is rare for the project team Pancake to come forward. Unexpectedly, the project team's explanation made the entire incident clearer. The most absurd thing is that the latest evidence shows that this was originally an on chain coup directed and starring by Binance, and they actually had to pull the entire community and act with them. _________ 1、 Binance is pretending to be fake, but the real hammer of the trading address is nowhere to be hidden Regarding the biggest manipulator of voting - addresses starting with 0xD183, I have already provided detailed evidence in the previous article that they belong to the official Binance platform. Simply put, this address: It is a "clearing wallet" officially granted whitelist permission by BNB Chain; Binance has repeatedly used this address to collect and liquidate assets in security incidents; The address had never participated in any governance before, but it accurately "woke up" before the proposal began; Lock up 25 million CAKE and become the top voting party; Pancake officials have not denied that the address is owned by Binance or controlled by Binance officials. The above five points are basically solid: this governance is mainly controlled by Binance. Without a doubt, if Binance were to manipulate this vote, the result would naturally have been predetermined in advance. Unfortunately, the latest evidence once again proves this point. _________ 2、 The leaked unlock page in advance confirms that this is a pre planned governance attack If it is Binance operation control, then the result is undoubtedly certain. The latest evidence shows that pre unlocked pages were already in development before the voting results were announced, indicating that Binance and Pancake had essentially predetermined the outcome and declared victory ahead of time. This logic lies in: In theory, governing voters must be locked in for a long time in order to have the right to vote; This Pancake governance vote has given a rare statement: as long as the proposal is passed, it will be unlocked immediately and no longer locked up The voting has not yet started, and the unlocking page is already under development (note: at the time of this article, the page had been deleted by the project team, but was captured by community members) The above three points clearly indicate that before the voting began, Binance and Pancake were 100% certain that the proposal would be passed. In other words, this governance vote was a game and a game for Binance and Pancake, and a complete set of action paths were prepared around this victory. Planned, scripted, with retreat routes, and predetermined results. This is the whole truth behind this governance vote. Binance uses its own power to tell everyone: governance can exist, but it cannot threaten me; DAO can participate, but not beyond me; Emission can be discussed, but ultimately it's up to me to decide. _________ 3、 Since there is obvious manipulation and the project team is trying to cover it up, what is Binance afraid of? In fact, Binance manipulation is not surprising, and their confidence in winning is also not surprising. However, surprisingly, in yesterday's response from the project team, it was mentioned that the above address is only a whale address. What are they afraid of? Why beautify Binance addresses as harmless to humans and livestock? Is it because Binance wants to maintain the illusion that "Binance is a participant" and is unwilling and afraid to admit the reality that "Binance is a trader"? I think what they are afraid of is that you see through this operation, which is never fair, and they are afraid that you will expose that it is indeed abusing power. They know that once admitted, the entire disguise of 'decentralized governance' will completely collapse, and the fig leaf of power will be completely gone. _________ 4、 We are not afraid of the strong, what we are afraid of is that the strong do not recognize the rules We have seen governance dominated by power, nor have we seen cases of power recovery within agreements. But the saddest and funniest reality in this industry, like Binance, is that they have to monopolize resources, monopolize the power of interpretation, and have the entire community accompany them in a cosplay of "governance democracy". Since you are an absolute center, why do you still maintain the illusion of "community participation"? Since you are going to launch an on chain coup, why not honestly tell users: We no longer need DAO? You cleared the governance rights of the community DAO overnight, completely abolished the veCAKE model, and collected all emissions into the hands of the team, yet you still want us to praise you for "successful reform"? What the hell is this his mother black. You are not only the exchange, wallet, chain controller, project investor, and clearing address controller. You hold everything, while all community members only have the role of "cooperating and performing". Excuse me Binance: Is this the Web3 you want? Today, we should all see one thing clearly: as long as power can bypass the system and be liquidated at any time, decentralization is an illusion. _________ 5、 We must question Binance: How long will you remain silent before you dare to face everything you have destroyed with your own hands? I want to ask Binance: Since you want dictatorship, why do you still want cosplay to become a community governance? Since we are required to cooperate in the play, why bother trying to cover it up? How long do you have to remain silent before you dare to face your arrogance; How long do you have to evade before you dare to admit that you are not a participant in governance, but a manipulator of the system? What face does a project that is more greedy for power than any centralized empire have to claim to promote decentralization. If you want to be an emperor and pretend to be democratic, even young mentor Kim Jong un may have to stand up and applaud, saying, "Your acting skills are excellent The community has never opposed the strong, but rather the powerful forces that recklessly cleanse under the guise of collaboration, and the operators who treat rules as props and systems as games. As the old saying goes, the scariest thing is never the knife, but the person who holds the knife but pretends not to. Binance, this time, the knife in your hand cannot be hidden. Okay, be generous and admit it. ——Kind reminder from the community.