I came across this tweet from CZ early in the morning, and I would like to share my thoughts on whether "Building" can make money. Firstly, can Building make money at this stage? I can responsibly tell you that there are very, very few opportunities to earn money purely through Build, and what you earn from Build is the money of people who build the same build. Think carefully and see if this is the truth. Everyone knows what Build means. Whether it's community or consensus, it's about building. That's right, after all, Bitcoin is built on Build. However, in recent years, the meaning of Build has gradually changed. Previously, Build and Hold were highly related, but now Build and "pour" are highly related. Because early cryptocurrencies or cryptocurrencies that can be developed have a core essence that is difficult to replicate and tamper with. For example, let's talk about the top five tokens in cryptocurrency market value: BTC is essentially promoting decentralization, censorship resistance, and immutability. 2. ETH is essentially a programmable blockchain, programmed based on trust in the network. 3. USDT is essentially the underlying currency of the cryptocurrency market, anchored in the US dollar as a compensatory asset. XRP is essentially a neutral settlement bridge asset, serving as an intermediate bridge currency for cross-border payment systems designed for financial institutions. BNB essentially leveraged Binance's profitability at the user level. Although they both look sexy, there is actually a big difference. Bitcoin has created blockchain and cryptocurrency, while Ethereum has created smart contracts. These two are completely decentralized products, and even though Satoshi Nakamoto has never appeared, and even Vitalik Buterin is now facing a lot of criticism, it cannot change this essence. If USDT is exposed to not having enough pledged assets, if it is exposed to being suppressed by world powers, or if it is exposed to a US debt crisis, the value of USDT is subject to too much centralization interference. Not to mention XRP, a lawsuit from the SEC can cause XRP to suffer for two years, and it is only after the end of the lawsuit with the SEC that it can return to its peak. BNB is actually the foundation of users' trust in Binance, and as a golden shovel, BNB also provides wealth effects. But Binance is ultimately a centralized company, and the pressure it faces will not be less than XRP and USDT, and may even be greater. Therefore, let alone anything else, among the top five, only Build Bitcoin and Ethereum have a greater chance of success, while Build others are more susceptible to external interference. Even if they are built better, they may be hit by centralized power. Not to mention that Build now does not mean Hold, it is more of a pyramid scheme where others buy together. More than 99.99% of tokens are like this, why is it difficult to continue rising after reaching a market value? Because this story is not sexy anymore, or people no longer have high expectations for future market value growth. Is this because there is no build? I think it's exactly the opposite, but it has reached a threshold of liquidity, in other words, the Build has come to an end. Of course, there are still examples of falling from high levels and then rebounding again, which is true, but most of these are not caused by Build. They are mostly either event driven or capital driven, because the "build" drive to return to the peak is not non-existent, but too few. Because the Holder is gradually decreasing during the Build process. If this problem cannot be solved, Building has become pouring. I have seen too many communities, and only a few large holders have successfully transformed from Build to 'rich people'. Your Build may just be someone else's exit liquidity. Secondly, can Building make money at this stage? (That's right) I can responsibly tell you that relying solely on Build may not make money, but if Build reaches the right track and holds the right assets, there is a chance. Build does not mean building a project or a token, but rather representing an industry, a track, or a narrative. If it's for the industry, the track, and the narrative, I think there are great opportunities to make money, because it represents your understanding of the industry, the track, and the narrative. Although it cannot be said to be 100% profitable, the probability of making money is definitely not just based on luck. Early implementation of price discovery is the market's reward for Builder. The real Build is no longer about foolishly posting pyramid scheme advertisements on Twitter, nor is it about believing in ALL IN, but about supplementing the industry, track, and narrative. And Hold cannot be blindly taken, but based on sufficient understanding, your Hold is not only about your dreams, but also depends on how many Hold have the same dreams as you, how much they hold, whether they really work hard for their dreams or for harvesting you. This tweet is sponsored by @ ApeXProtocolCN | Dex With Apex