The biggest problem with BSC: how to develop without relying on CZ To take BSC to the next level, in addition to solving the performance and wallet issues of public chains, three transitions need to be completed: 1. Shift the community's attention from following @ cz-binance to focusing on the BNB Chain project and the Builder, otherwise the project will have a bunch of activities, it's better for CZ to do a transaction. Focusing too much on CZ's ideas, the community cannot grow organically. 2. The transition from the Chinese speaking community to the international community, starting from the Chinese speaking community is actually the right thing BSC did, but to break through the circle, it still requires a global community, more international community discussions, and the introduction of overseas (non VC accumulation bureau) projects 3. The transition from product centric to value centric. We know that BNB Chain relies on Binance exchange, but the operation of public chains and exchanges is completely different. Exchanges focus on products, while public chains also have values and culture. For example, ETH represents decentralization, Solana represents high performance, and Base represents Consumer Apps. What is the core cultural positioning and values of BSC? If it's just because of Binance, then it can only attract builders who want to invest in Binance, and these builders without values will not last long. Why not let BSC engage in activities with some technical communities, donate to open source communities, participate in the construction of AI, Desci research and other fields, attract the Builder community that shares the same values, so as to ensure the sustainable development of a public chain.