This week in East 8 Time zone, BTC has been oscillating in a very narrow range of approximately $67,967.10 — $68,177.20. The market remains calm, but cryptocurrency concept stocks have retreated simultaneously: MSTR -2.73%, BMNR -2.56%, COIN -0.75%, GEMI -8.6%, with secondary sentiment having first overstretched optimism. Beneath this surface calm, three main lines are quietly reshaping the chip structure: Wintermute characterizes the market as "dominated by leveraged positions," Nakamoto is expanding against the trend with a $107 million acquisition, expecting to complete it by Q1 2026, while Gemini has simultaneously erupted in personnel turmoil with three executives “collectively resigning effective immediately.” Technical support remains, volatility is compressed, and on the policy front, there has been a marginal warming due to the White House's support for the “Digital Asset Market Transparency Act.” The real question becomes: in the current situation where regulation is gradually taking shape and volatility is locked in by leveraged structures, what type of bets are different institutions making for the next cycle? Are they expanding positions, discreetly restructuring, or retreating early?

Hidden Risks in Narrow Fluctuations: BTC

● Technical Range and Structural Overlay: According to OKX market data, the BTC price is locked between $67,967.10 and $68,177.20, with short-term fluctuations below 0.3%. However, this price level overlaps with long-term technical support, meaning that the "boring market" hides structural significance. Narrow fluctuations often imply that both bulls and bears are unwilling to make significant statements at the current price, leading more funds to choose to shift risk into derivatives and leveraged structures, thus the calm on the spot chart is ironically a cover for leveraged speculation.

● Historical Memory of the 200-Week Moving Average: Wintermute noted in a research report that BTC is finding support near the 200-week moving average, and historically this indicator often corresponds to "bottom formation areas" during previous bear markets. This long-term moving average serves as both a trend boundary and a psychological anchor for institutional pricing. Once the price repeatedly finds support near this level, it will be seen as a technical consensus of the "long-term value range," enabling both opportunistic layouts and passive adjustments to have a basis for external explanation.

● Sentiment Transitioning from Panic to Cautious Speculation: In a pattern where low price volatility coexists with key long-term support, extreme panic has notably cooled, yet unilateral optimism has not been established. The market is more characterized by "cautious betting." Willingness to trade in the spot market is contracting, while leveraged positions in derivatives are seeking short-term breakout opportunities amidst this compressed volatility. Any actions deviating from the 200-week moving average will be amplified as "testing the direction" signals, triggering rapid oscillations in sentiment within localized ranges.

Leveraged Positions Dominating the Rhythm: Wintermute's Market Portrait

● Structure Judgment of Spot Retreating to the Background: Wintermute's core viewpoint is that the current BTC market is no longer driven by “new spot buying,” but rather controlled by contract leverage structures. In other words, prices are more about the reallocation around existing positions rather than pricing based on new funds. The continuation and reversal of trends are often triggered by forced liquidation, position reduction, and hedging rather than being directly dictated by bulk spot buying or selling from one side.

● Liquidation Chains Amplifying "False Breakouts": In this leveraged-dominated narrow range, the high leveraged positions in the contract market mean that small fluctuations can trigger liquidation and stop-loss thresholds. If the price breaks through the range boundary by a few hundred dollars, it might ignite a small number of excessively leveraged positions, thus triggering more position reductions and forced liquidations in a chain reaction, creating a "false breakout" that amplifies neurotic behavior: the market appears to choose a direction, but in essence is just a temporary restructuring of leveraged tiers, followed by the price being drawn back near the mean again.

● Institutional Rhythm under Leveraged Environment: In a high-leverage dominated environment, long-term funds and market-making institutions must adjust their rhythms. Long-term funds prefer to build positions or rebalance in batches near the 200-week moving average, utilizing low leverage or even no leverage with cash and long-term options to hedge against volatility. Market-making institutions need to manage their positions and risk limits more dynamically and precisely, reduce directional exposure, and focus their energies on “structural alpha” like funding rates, basis, and term structures, instead of betting on each breakout being the start of a true trend.

Contrasting Personnel Vacuum from Acquisition Expansion: Nakamoto and Gemini's Polar Choices

● Nakamoto's Counter-Trend Acquisition Chips: During the phase of price stagnation and sentiment noise reduction, Nakamoto signed a $107 million acquisition agreement, expected to complete by Q1 2026, placing a medium-sized cash bet on a two-year cycle window. This choice indicates that management is more willing to allocate assets during suppressed volatility rather than chasing after higher valuations during euphoric phases, aiming for integration benefits in the next bull market with liquidity premiums.

● Contrast with Gemini's Collective Departure: In stark contrast, three executives from Gemini “collectively resigned effective immediately”, with the related situation disclosed via documents submitted to Bloomberg Terminal. At the same industry cycle node, one side continues to expand through capital acquisition, while the other experiences simultaneous withdrawals from top teams, conveying starkly different messages to the market: the former is investing in the future, while the latter appears more like a manifestation of strategic hesitancy in public narratives.

● Personnel Vacuum and Trust and Advancement: Without speculating on specific reasons for departures, the sudden and “immediate effect” resignations of executives will inevitably cause slower decision-making rhythms and oscillating external expectations for a while. For Gemini, in the short term, it must face a decision vacuum regarding partner coordination, regulatory communication, and new business advancement, as well as whether its brand trust has been compromised; conversely, Nakamoto is locking in assets and teams through acquisitions, conveying the stance that “the chips are increasing, and the game will continue to be played.” Both attitudes coalesce to outline the institutional differentiation path of this cycle.

New Forces Boosting Infrastructure: Monad's Talent Strategy

● Introducing Executives from Optimism and FalconX: Beyond the aforementioned institutional movements, Monad Foundation recently announced it has brought in executives with backgrounds from Optimism and FalconX, also during the time of constrained BTC volatility, but with increased regulatory and institutional competition. This move has not bound to a specific mainnet launch schedule, but rather first supplements the puzzle for future public chain infrastructure and institutional service capabilities with "human" resources.

● Experience Migration and Route Reinforcement: Executives from Optimism bring frontline experience in Ethereum scaling, Rollup architecture, and ecosystem operations, while the FalconX background implies long-term practices in institutional brokerage, liquidity distribution, and compliance services. The combination directs Monad's narrative more clearly towards “high performance + institution-friendly,” indicating that it not only needs to run fast but also to know how to connect with market-making, custody, and trading to lay the groundwork for the next round of institutional fund inflow.

● Talent Restructuring and Resource Shuffle: When we place Monad's talent layout alongside Nakamoto's acquisition expansion and Gemini's personnel loss, a clear picture emerges: industry resources are transitioning from marginalized and hesitant entities to projects that are daring to ramp up preparations for the next round during turbulence. Some lock in assets with $107 million, others secure experience and networks with core executives, while some simultaneously lose key management teams. The entire ecological power and resource map is being quietly redrawn.

White House Signals: New Order of High Leverage Under the Transparency Act

● Compliance Tone and Regulatory Direction: While the market structure is being reorganized, the policy front has sent signals of the White House supporting the “Digital Asset Market Transparency Act”, setting a tone for the subsequent regulatory framework of “enhancing transparency and strengthening compliance.” Rather than imposing new restrictions, it outlines the boundaries for a previously highly free market: data disclosure, clearer market behavior norms, and well-defined platform responsibilities will all become essential prerequisites for the subsequent competition.

● Repricing of Leverage, Market Making, and Compliance Operations: With the expectation of greater transparency, market-making conduct, leverage product design, and institutional operational pathways will face repricing. High leverage won't disappear, but clarity is required regarding leverage structures, risk factors, and counterparty information, indicating that traditional opaque high-multiple contracts and untransparent capital pools will be constrained, while products featuring compliance disclosure, risk stratification, and auditable structures may receive policy dividends, drawing in more conservative institutions to participate.

● From Chaotic Speculation to High-Leverage Betting Under Regulation: The support released by the White House resonates with the current situation of BTC securing near long-term support levels, leveraged positions dominating fluctuations, and institutional strategy differentiation—the market is transitioning from chaotic, retail emotion-driven speculation to more rule-defined, higher transparency high-leverage betting. The leading force of the next cycle is likely not anonymous whales and unlicensed platforms, but rather market-making institutions, exchanges, and infrastructure providers that have begun to adjust their structures according to regulatory requirements.

Surface Calm in the Market, True Betting Has Already Begun

BTC is maintaining around long-term technical support, with prices compressed in the narrow range of $67,967.10 — $68,177.20, driven by leveraged structures rather than spot buying. Additionally, cryptocurrency concept stocks such as MSTR, BMNR, COIN, GEMI have already reported their decline in advance. This dislocated state of “stable coin prices, falling stock prices, and tightened leverage” constitutes the backdrop of the current cycle: panic has receded, but a true unilateral trend has not yet restarted. Parallelly, there is a comprehensive differentiation in institutional strategies: Nakamoto is betting on acquisition integration with $107 million, Monad is betting on infrastructure and institutionalization with the introduction of executives, while Gemini is passively entering a transition period amidst executive departures. Resources are shifting from hesitant directions to camps that dare to stride forward during turbulence, and these decisions will profoundly impact the landscape of the next cycle.

For investors, what truly needs to be clarified is how to distinguish short-term noise from the mid- and long-term chip restructuring in an environment where "regulatory strengthening" and "leverage amplification" coexist: on one hand, do not treat every narrow “false breakout” as the starting point of a trend, staying vigilant against emotional overreactions stemming from liquidation chains; on the other hand, pay closer attention to who is choosing to merge, expand, or introduce high-quality talent at this time, and who is being forced to contract, bleed or halt. Price stagnation does not equate to story stagnation; often, when the market appears the calmest, the chips and dominance of the next cycle have already completed the first round of handover in the shadows.

Join our community to discuss together and become stronger!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh

OKX Benefit Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Benefit Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。