A congressional inquiry has intensified scrutiny of federal crypto oversight as lawmakers press regulators on enforcement priorities. House Financial Services Committee Ranking Member Maxine Waters, joined by Representatives Sean Casten and Brad Sherman, sent a letter on Jan. 15, 2026, urging Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Paul S. Atkins to explain recent crypto enforcement rollbacks.
The lawmakers argue the SEC has sharply pulled back from pursuing potential securities law violations tied to crypto assets, despite prior court victories. Ranking Member Maxine Waters stated:
“We write to express my deep concern regarding the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) dramatic retrenchment from its responsibility to investigate and prosecute cases involving crypto asset securities.”
She added that the shift “raises troubling questions about the SEC’s priorities and effectiveness” and “puts both investors and the U.S. economy at risk.” The letter notes that since January 2025 the agency has dismissed or closed at least a dozen crypto-related cases, including actions against Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken, even after judges allowed key claims to proceed.
Read more: SEC Publishes Crypto FAQs Clarifying Trading, Custody, and Market Infrastructure Rules
The letter also highlights the SEC’s decision to stay its civil enforcement case against Tron Foundation founder Justin Sun, calling the nearly yearlong pause a signal of selective enforcement. The lawmakers wrote: “The SEC’s request to stay the Sun case, which has now been in place for 11 months, signals to the market that securities laws are enforced selectively, and that those with sufficient political influence can evade accountability.”
They urged the Commission to lift the stay or pursue a settlement delivering comparable relief to a favorable court ruling, while demanding preservation and production of records tied to crypto enforcement decisions, the Sun matter, and potential foreign ties. The lawmakers conclude that consistent enforcement is critical to restoring investor confidence and enabling Congress to fulfill its oversight role, stating:
“Your response to the Letter is essential to Congress’s ability to meet its constitutionally-mandated oversight obligations and deserves your immediate attention.”
- Why are lawmakers criticizing the SEC’s crypto enforcement strategy?
They argue the SEC has dropped or paused major crypto cases, weakening investor protection and regulatory clarity. - Which crypto companies were named in dismissed or closed SEC actions?
The letter cites cases involving Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken. - What concerns were raised about Justin Sun’s enforcement stay?
Lawmakers say the prolonged pause suggests selective enforcement tied to political influence. - What are lawmakers demanding from the SEC now?
They want explanations, document preservation, and renewed action to restore confidence in crypto oversight.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
