Recently, the Solayer team transferred approximately 18.32 million LAYER to Binance, estimated to be worth around 3 million USD at the time of the transaction. This large on-chain transfer was quickly captured and amplified by several monitoring agencies, drawing significant market attention. Historical data shows that the team’s related addresses have cumulatively received about 34.88 million LAYER (approximately 21.65 million USD), and after this transfer, it is shown on-chain that they still hold about 16.56 million LAYER, corresponding to a market value of about 2.7 million USD. The team’s chip structure and concentration are undergoing quantifiable changes. The industry is highly sensitive to large transfers from project addresses, and regarding this nearly three million USD scale of concentrated inflow, the market has already seen multiple interpretations ranging from "potential selling pressure" to "operational arrangements." The tension between on-chain transparency and the lack of information from the project party has been highlighted once again in this incident.
Concentrated Entry of 18 Million Tokens and Team Chip Migration
● Source of Funds Structure: According to the briefing, the Solayer team’s related wallets have historically received about 34.88 million LAYER, corresponding to a value of approximately 21.65 million USD. This portion of chips is viewed as the core token pool controlled by the team, with specific sources including project allocation, internal collection, and various channels. However, the precise proportion of this to the total supply of tokens remains unverified information, and it is currently impossible to provide an accurate ratio in public data, only confirming its significant weight in the overall chip structure of the project.
● Proportion of This Transfer: After completing the concentrated transfer of approximately 18.32 million LAYER to Binance, compared to the approximately 16.56 million LAYER currently held by the team’s address, it can be estimated that this transfer accounts for about 52.5% of the team’s existing holdings, meaning that over half of the verifiable on-chain chips in the team’s hands have been moved to exchange addresses, with the holding form clearly shifting from "on-chain self-holding" to "exchange custody or pending disposal."
● On-Chain Verifiable Information: Regarding the scale and path of this transaction, several on-chain monitoring accounts have provided cross-verification, including Lookonchain, Spotonchain, and others, which have disclosed similar data through public channels, and financial media accounts have provided secondary reports. Although the briefing did not include detailed timestamps, the transaction amount, quantity, and fund flow have been clearly recorded on-chain, serving as an objective basis for this analysis.
Team's Chip Variation from Over 30 Million to 16.56 Million
From a longer-term perspective, the cumulative receipt of 34.88 million LAYER by the Solayer team’s related addresses and the approximately 16.56 million LAYER still shown on-chain have formed a visible trajectory of chip consumption and migration. Regardless of whether these outflows ultimately enter market circulation, market-making accounts, or other internal arrangements, the most intuitive change for external investors is that both the absolute amount and relative concentration of "locked chips" in the team’s hands are declining. The large tokens transferred to Binance are a key node in this chip reconfiguration process, which on one hand weakens the team’s visible holdings at the on-chain address level, and on the other hand opens a channel for potential liquidity release through the transfer to the exchange.
In terms of value, the current market value of the approximately 16.56 million LAYER held by the team’s related wallets is about 2.7 million USD. This portion of chips still under the team’s control continues to constitute an important source of potential selling pressure and governance discourse in the future. As long as these tokens have not fully entered the secondary market for free circulation, the team’s influence on project governance, directional games, and even ecological resource allocation remains. However, once there is a significant outflow again, the market's association with "release of selling pressure and dilution of governance rights" will continue to heat up. More broadly, the high proportion of team chips has always been a controversial focus in the industry; on one hand, it is seen as a reflection of the team’s strong binding and incentive consistency to the project, while on the other hand, it can easily lead to valuation discounts and risk premiums. The Solayer team currently still holds tens of millions of tokens, which may be interpreted by some investors as a "safety cushion," while others may view it as "chips that could be dumped into the market at any time," thus forming a complex balance of both premiums and discounts at the valuation level.
Large Deposits to Exchanges and Boundaries of Potential Selling Pressure
Regarding the transfer of approximately 18.32 million LAYER, it is necessary to first clarify the difference between "transferring to an exchange" and "actual selling." From the perspective of on-chain data, the outside world can only confirm that the tokens have been transferred from the team-controlled wallet to an address managed by Binance, but cannot directly observe subsequent matching, order placement, or over-the-counter arrangements within the exchange. Therefore, equating this transfer directly with a completed selling action is unfounded, and it cannot be simply labeled as "dumping" in the absence of evidence.
Based on past industry cases, large token transfers from project parties or team addresses to exchanges may correspond to various scenarios: for example, to enhance secondary market depth by supplementing chips to market-making accounts, to prepare liquidity for upcoming listings or new trading pairs, to reserve a pool of funds that can be liquidated at any time for project operations, market promotion, or cooperative incentives, or even for internal financial settlement or restructuring arrangements. Since Solayer has not issued a clear announcement explaining the purpose of this fund, any single interpretation of motivation carries obvious risks. A more reasonable approach is to view it as a neutral action that "opens up a higher liquidity field," and to make dynamic judgments in conjunction with subsequent transactions and announcements.
In terms of scale, this transfer of approximately 3 million USD is not an absolute "huge amount" compared to Binance's overall daily trading volume and the current market size of LAYER, but within a single project and a short time frame, it is still sufficient to disturb market depth and short-term price expectations. If this chip is concentrated and sold off in the short term, local selling pressure may be amplified on an emotional level; however, if it is digested through market-making, dispersed transactions, or long-term inventory, the actual price impact boundary will be significantly narrowed. Therefore, a rational assessment of this large deposit needs to place it within the overall liquidity framework of the exchange, rather than relying solely on absolute numbers to amplify emotions.
Unlocking Rhythm and Invisible Pressure of Token Economics
What influences the market's medium to long-term expectations is not only the visible single transfer but more critically its relationship with the rhythm of token unlocking. Currently, there is still a lack of a complete unlocking timetable disclosed by Solayer, including the release paths and rhythms of different pools such as team shares, early investors, and ecological incentives, and it is also unknown what proportion the approximately 18.32 million LAYER occupies in the overall unlocking plan. In the presence of this critical information gap, the market finds it difficult to accurately assess the rhythm of newly circulating chips in the near future, and it is even harder to determine whether this transfer is "part of a phased release" or "the starting point of a structural change."
However, based on the current volume and concentration of chips held by the team, it can be anticipated that: regardless of whether the unlocking is done in a cliff-style or linear release, as long as the team’s share has not fully entered the market, the potential selling pressure expectation from top to bottom will always exist. This structural expectation does not always translate into actual selling, but it will be continuously discounted in market valuation, secondary trading activity, and the risk pricing of long-term holders. Compared to similar projects, those with frequent large transfers from team addresses often see their price performance more easily fluctuate dramatically with emotional swings, but this does not mean there is a simple linear causal relationship between "frequent transfers" and "price declines." The macro environment, project progress, and overall liquidity conditions also deeply participate in the pricing process. For Solayer, this incident provides a window to observe the operation of token economics, but it is insufficient to independently support conclusions about its long-term trends.
The Game of On-Chain Monitoring and Information Transparency
In this large transfer event by the Solayer team, the quick follow-up by Lookonchain, Spotonchain, and some financial media accounts once again demonstrates the value of third-party on-chain monitoring in bridging information asymmetry. For ordinary investors, the internal flow of funds from the project party often remains in a "black box" state, while on-chain tracking tools and data accounts expose the hidden financial behaviors behind addresses in near real-time through aggregation, annotation, and interpretation, thereby compressing the space for information advantage and allowing more people to make judgments based on the same objective data.
However, contrasting with data transparency, the project party did not provide clear explanations regarding the purpose of the transfer, planned uses, or unlocking arrangements before and after this large transfer, and the communication gap has been continuously amplified in market sentiment, easily translating into a discount on project governance transparency and team credibility. The lack of explanation does not equate to necessarily negative motives, but it increases risk premiums and imaginative space in an uncertain environment, making speculations about "selling pressure" and "cash-out" more likely to prevail. For the community and market participants, how to interpret such monitoring data is one of the core capabilities for building an effective risk assessment framework: one must neither ignore the large transfers that actually occur on-chain nor, in the absence of background and official information, label any fund movement as malicious behavior.
A more pragmatic path is to combine on-chain monitoring results with project announcements, token economic designs, historical behavior patterns, and other multidimensional information to form a layered judgment system: the bottom layer consists of verifiable transaction data, the middle layer involves rational deductions about token structure and unlocking mechanisms, and the top layer is cautious speculation about the team’s behavioral motives. Only within such a framework can investors maintain decision-making stability amidst information noise, neither overly panicking nor blindly optimistic in each instance of large transfer events like Solayer's.
Observing Solayer's Chip Game from a Large Transfer
In summary, the Solayer team’s related wallet transferred approximately 18.32 million LAYER to Binance, which is equivalent to about half of their current holdings, constituting a substantial disturbance to the overall chip pattern of the project and market sentiment. On one hand, this transfer compressed the team’s visible on-chain holdings, reshaping the structure of chip concentration and potential circulating supply; on the other hand, it also ignited widespread discussions in the market regarding future selling pressure, price volatility, and team fund management through the strong signal of "large team chips reaching the exchange."
It must be repeatedly emphasized that in the absence of official unlocking details and disclosures of transfer motives, any simplistic interpretation equating this action to "already dumping" or "inevitably cashing out" is an over-interpretation. What can currently be confirmed are only the token quantity, value scale, and flow, which do not directly lead to specific selling actions in the order book. Therefore, a more prudent approach is to view this transfer as an important observational event rather than a conclusive endpoint.
Looking ahead, investors should focus on three dimensions: first, whether Solayer will provide explanations for the purpose of this large transfer or supplement the unlocking timetable to reduce information uncertainty; second, the subsequent flow of the approximately 18.32 million LAYER on-chain and changes in fund behaviors within and outside Binance, including whether new large outflows or reallocations occur; third, whether the project will announce clearer token economics and governance arrangements in future stages to address market concerns regarding the concentration of team chips and fund management. Only through the gradual clarification of these pieces of information can the risk profile and valuation framework of Solayer be dynamically adjusted, and this large transfer can find its true position over time.
Join our community to discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
