Original Title: "DASH, ZEC, and ICP and Other Old Coins 'Revived': Nostalgia for Capital or a Sign of New Narratives?"
Original Author: Ding Dong, Odaily Planet Daily
In the past few days, while the market has continued to weaken, a group of "old coins" has risen against the trend, sparking a frenzy on their own.
As mainstream narratives become increasingly exhausted, these long-dormant names have reappeared at the top of the gainers' list. They are not the creators of new stories, but they shine once again amidst the ruins of the old era. Some see it as the "return of veterans," while others believe it is merely a momentary curiosity of new funds. Regardless, during a phase of low liquidity and scarce hotspots, the unexpected excitement of old projects has become a mirror reflecting market sentiment.
DASH, ZK: The Rotation Game of Privacy Funds
Privacy coins are undoubtedly the core engine of this market trend. After ZEC skyrocketed 40 times in a month, the market found itself in a dilemma—afraid to chase further but unwilling to miss out. Thus, funds began to rotate among similar themes, with XMR, DASH, ZK, MINA, and others making the list.
DASH (Digital Cash) has a story that dates back to 2014. Originally named "Darkcoin," it was created by Evan Duffield and achieved optional privacy through CoinJoin mixing technology, positioning itself as "digital cash." Although both Dash and Zcash have privacy payments as their core selling points, their design philosophies, technical routes, privacy strengths, governance methods, and actual uses are completely different.
Dash was born even before Zcash, with the former emphasizing "fast payments + optional privacy + on-chain governance," sacrificing some privacy for speed, governance, and real merchant adoption, making it suitable for everyday small payments. The latter, on the other hand, emphasizes absolute privacy protection, pursuing mathematically absolute privacy but sacrificing speed, usability, and merchant acceptance, mainly used for large private transfers.
The differences in their positioning also determine the differences in their user groups. Dash still has thousands of real merchants in Venezuela and Colombia, and the DashPay wallet (username payments) has been launched; Zcash has almost zero real merchants, with 90% of its trading volume coming from exchange arbitrage or the dark web. It is precisely because of its extreme pursuit of privacy protection that its space for survival has been sharply compressed under regulatory pressure.
If DASH is the "realist" of privacy coins, then ZEC is the "idealist." One compromises with life, while the other remains loyal to mathematics.
As for ZK (ZKsync), it represents the "Ethereum re-narrative" of the zero-knowledge track. ZKsync mainly achieves high throughput and privacy protection through zero-knowledge proof (ZK-Rollup) technology and is regarded as an important solution for Ethereum scaling.
On November 1, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin praised ZKsync for its "quiet but valuable contribution to the Ethereum ecosystem." This tweet acted like a signal flare, and in the atmosphere of rekindled privacy narratives, ZK became the focus, with short-term gains exceeding 160%.
Although there was a subsequent pullback, on the evening of November 4, ZKsync founder Alex released the "ZK Token Proposal Part I," proposing significant updates to the ZK token economic model: all network revenue will be used to repurchase and burn ZK tokens, shifting it from a purely governance token to an asset with value-capturing functions.
Currently, the privacy sector remains a hotspot for fund chasing, with projects like SCRT and ROSE being re-examined due to the new narrative of combining privacy computing with AI. It can be said that in the crevice of the game between regulation and freedom, the privacy sector has become an "emotional outlet" for market funds. It serves as both a refuge and a speculation.
ICP, AR: The Old Dream of the Storage Track Reignited
ICP (Internet Computer) was founded by genius scientist Dominic Williams in Zurich, Switzerland, in 2016, led by the DFINITY Foundation, and officially launched its mainnet on May 10, 2021. Its ultimate vision is to completely replace centralized cloud services like Amazon AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure with a public chain, turning the entire internet into a "world computer."
At that time, Internet Computer conducted multiple rounds of private placements, raising about $163-195 million, with a valuation that once reached $9.5 billion. This was second only to Polkadot among blockchain projects at the time and was the second-highest fundraising L1 public chain in history, with a financing lineup that included well-known crypto investment institutions like Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), Polychain, and Multicoin.
However, the ideal was too grand, and reality was too complex. The project peaked at $2,800 upon launch, then quickly fell back to around $300, with a drop of up to 90%. After four years, its valuation has shrunk from $9.5 billion to a current market cap of $42 million, which is quite lamentable. The token hit a low of $1.86 during the massive crash on October 10, and within a month, it surged 5 times, reaching a high of $9.84.
AR (Arweave) is a permanent data storage protocol founded by Sam Williams in 2017 and launched in 2018, positioned as "Permaweb" (permanent web), with the core selling point of one-time payment for permanent storage, addressing issues of data loss and censorship. Arweave abandoned the linear structure of traditional blockchains and created a unique "Blockweave" data structure, where miners must not only store new data but also randomly prove they can access historical old data through the Proof of Access (PoA) mechanism to earn mining rewards. This economic incentive addresses the challenge of long-term data preservation in blockchains.
In February 2025, the AO mainnet officially launched, marking a historic leap for Arweave from "permanent storage" to "permanent computing." Before AO went live, Arweave was defined by the market as "expensive cold storage." Although it achieved true "one-time payment, permanent preservation," its application scenarios were mainly concentrated in "write once, read rarely" cold data fields like NFT metadata backup, archives, and mirror websites. The emergence of AO has propelled Arweave's narrative upgrade, shifting it from "storage" to "computing + AI."
However, on the market level, its price has long been sluggish. After reaching a peak of $90 during the 2021 bull market, AR's price has remained stagnant between $5 and $15, with its market cap far surpassed by cheaper competitors like Filecoin and Irys. In 2024, driven by market sentiment and the AO narrative, it once rebounded to $50. Now, it is once again hovering around $5; can it replicate the trend of 2024 and embark on a rebound?
DCR: The Underestimated Governance Textbook
Decred (DCR) is one of the earliest and most successful "on-chain autonomous organization" (DAO) projects in the cryptocurrency field, founded by former Bitcoin developer Jake Yocom-Piatt, and launched its mainnet on February 8, 2016. Decred was created to address Bitcoin's biggest pain point—governance rigidity. It uses a unique hybrid PoW+PoS consensus, allowing holders rather than miners to dominate network rule changes, budget allocations, and future directions. Specifically, PoW miners are responsible for block production, while PoS stakeholders are responsible for validating blocks and voting. Any rule change requires 75% approval to prevent miner dictatorship or hard forks.
There are many public chain projects like Decred that operate based on Bitcoin code forks. Before 2021, the crypto industry’s exploration of blockchain was largely an attempt to patch its existing flaws outside the framework of Bitcoin using different technological paths. After the emergence of DeFi Summer, such projects gradually faded into the background, lost in the passage of time, with DCR's price hovering between $10 and $30 for years.
Conclusion: The Resurrection of Old Gods or the Echo of Illusions?
In terms of short-term prices, the rebounds of these old projects are mostly accompanied by pullbacks. After a brief frenzy, the market returns to a calm risk-testing phase. Whether they can withstand this test will determine if they replicate the miracle of ZEC or reenact a fleeting illusion.
A deeper reality is: the current crypto market is scarce in new narratives and tightening in liquidity. The "revival" of old coins is more like a nostalgic behavior when funds have nowhere to go, a brief reflection on the early "idealistic era" of crypto.
Perhaps investors do not truly believe these old projects will "revive," but at least these names remind them that the crypto market once had faith.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
