Key Points

• This article is written by Tiger Research. A single narrative used to drive the entire market, now the market moves based on real demand.
• Even in a sluggish market, mature fields such as stablecoins, DeFi, RWA, and meme tokens continue to survive.
• Ultimately, only projects that find product-market fit and generate real revenue from real users can survive.

1. The Past Narrative-Driven Crypto Market

In the crypto market, narratives have always been the core force driving participant attention and attracting liquidity. Major market cycles, such as DeFi Summer, have been assigned unique narratives, with the market repeating a cyclical pattern where liquidity shifts to the next narrative once the previous one fades.

From a macro level, the crypto market has gone through four major cycles, each dominated by a single narrative:

2020: DeFi

2021: NFT/P2E/GameFi

2022: L1/L2 Competition

2024: Restaking

In the narrative-driven growth story, GameFi produced the most extreme results.

Major traditional game publishers like Square Enix and Ubisoft entered this space, attracting $2.5 billion in funding in the first quarter of 2022 alone. However, fields that cannot demonstrate real product-market fit cannot last. The flagship game in the sector, Axie Infinity, saw its average monthly active players drop by 99.7%, from a peak of 2.8 million in January 2022 to about 8,000 in May 2026. This clearly illustrates how quickly narratives built mainly on rationale and capital can collapse.

2. The Narratives Consumed Last Year

As mentioned in our previous report, 2025 marks the peak of this narrative consumption pattern. Following the AI agent narrative, a new narrative appears almost every month, with the rotation speed continuously accelerating.

On the surface, this seems very wasteful, but it’s hard to deny that this rapid narrative rotation is key to maintaining retail investor attention and thereby becomes the core driving force of today’s market. Even so, the market's potential demand for these past narratives is aimed at the tokens themselves rather than the problems the products are meant to solve.

3. Supply Innovation Without Demand

One example illustrates how most past narratives developed.

A decentralized social media project emerged, addressing the issue of existing platforms monopolizing revenue and insufficiently compensating creators. It proposed a vision of lowering fees and returning content ownership and revenue to creators.

Token rewards: Early participants received token rewards, and as the story of earning money merely by being active on the platform spread, market interest grew.

User influx and expansion: Similar projects followed, issuing tokens around a minimum viable product, attracting users through airdrops and liquidity incentives, leading to rapid expansion in ecosystem market cap and trading volume.

Product development stagnation: The price and scale of rewards began to outstrip the product itself. Once fundraising and initial distribution were completed, development and user growth stagnated, and the original issue of creator compensation remained unresolved.

Liquidity exit: There was never a sufficiently large user base that strongly felt this issue; the incoming capital chased price appreciation rather than the product, so once the narrative peaked, liquidity and users would exit just as quickly.

This pattern repeated in several narratives, and the market ultimately recognized that supply innovation without potential demand is not very meaningful. The market began to confirm that only those projects generating real revenue and maintaining a stable user base matter, and only those demonstrating true product-market fit can survive.

4. 2026: The Era of Creating Demand and Product-Market Fit

Past narratives built and offered solutions without potential demand and tried to create demand afterward, whereas the PMF era operates in the opposite way: products are built to match existing demands among customers. The market is shifting toward real products, with user numbers and income growing along with the products and brands, rather than just token market cap increasing.

The five areas covered here are selected based on three criteria: usage metrics such as trading volume and income in the first half of 2026, trajectories of new players entering the fields, and growth in market cap. These criteria are significant because they are hard to artificially manufacture simultaneously in a short timeframe.

The following sections trace the initial problems each area aims to solve and the directions in which its leading players are now expanding.

4.1. Stablecoins: From Non-Volatile Payment Tools to Cross-Border Settlement Infrastructure

Stablecoins are tokens pegged to fiat currency values used as a means of payment and settlement. The market cap of this category is $304.2 billion, nearing its historical high of $321 billion.

Tether (USDT): Market cap of $184.08 billion, monthly settlement volume of $1.79 trillion (up 63% month-over-month), total settlements of $10.2 trillion over the past 12 months, net income over $10 billion in 2025, holding $141 billion in government bonds.

Circle (USDC): Market cap of $73.25 billion, the default stablecoin for major exchanges and institutional settlement channels like Coinbase.

Stablecoins initially served as a way to trade cryptocurrencies without exposure to volatility. Their role has expanded to include cross-border remittances and on-chain payment infrastructure.

Growth now takes more diverse forms. In June 2026, over 140 traditional companies, including Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, Coinbase, and BlackRock, announced the establishment of the OUSD (Open USD, from Open Standard) alliance. Non-USD stablecoins pegged to national currencies like the Korean won, Japanese yen, and euro are also becoming more common. Their total market cap remains small at only $1.2 billion, but the number of wallets holding them has grown thirtyfold, from 40,000 in January 2023 to 1.2 million in March 2026.

Stablecoins are no longer just a payment tool with a fixed value. They are evolving into settlement infrastructure that operates independently of borders and time zones.

4.2. DeFi: Built to Replace Banks, Now Part of Financial Infrastructure

DeFi refers to finance based on smart contracts, enabling borrowing, trading, and derivatives without centralized intermediaries.

Aave: Market cap of $1.397 billion, TVL of $14.53 billion, annual revenue of $119 million, a leading DeFi lending protocol.

Morpho: Market cap of $1.302 billion, TVL of $7.497 billion, annual revenue of $0 (with its annual fee of $222 million going entirely to lenders), briefly surpassed Aave's market cap from late May to June, with Aave regaining the lead in July.

Uniswap: Market cap of $2.287 billion, TVL of $3.14 billion, annual revenue of $850 million, a leading decentralized exchange, with a 24-hour trading volume of $2.66 billion.

Hyperliquid: Market cap of $13.47 billion, TVL of $6.07 billion, annual revenue of $874 million, accounting for roughly 76% of the perpetual contract DEX category and about 20% of overall DeFi, with a market share in on-chain perpetual contracts reaching 70%.

DeFi began in 2020, based on the premise of decentralization, returning profits earned by intermediaries like banks directly to users.

Today, its sustainability is not based on that ideology but rather on institutional demand for on-chain financial infrastructure. Morpho and Aave provide the treasury risk management and lending infrastructure institutions want, Uniswap supports trading of the assets institutions want, and Hyperliquid supports trading of traditional assets beyond just cryptocurrencies.

Each has evolved in directions that differ from its founding ideologies, but it is this decisive shift toward real demand that has enabled these protocols to survive and grow.

4.3. RWA: From Traditional Asset Democratization to Efficiency

RWA refers to the tokenization and on-chain distribution of traditional real-world assets such as government bonds and private credit. This category has a market cap of $65.2 billion, with tokenized government bonds being the largest subcategory at $13.4 billion.

Ondo Finance: TVL of $3.52 billion, ONDO market cap of $1.75 billion, leading provider of tokenized government bond infrastructure.

BlackRock BUIDL: AUM of $2.4 billion, being a fund token pegged to net asset value, it does not have a traditional market cap, and is the largest single tokenized government bond fund.

Maple Finance: SYRUP market cap of $218 million, private credit AUM of $4 billion, surpassing BlackRock BUIDL.

RWA aims to bring traditional asset management on-chain for faster settlement and accessibility. Its initial customer base was not institutions. The sector started with synthetic asset exchanges, leveraging the fact that the on-chain market was outside existing regulations to lower the barriers to trading real-world assets. However, today, institutions make up the largest user base in this field.

Tokenized stocks are a development worth close attention. Adoption by traditional institutions like Securitize and DTCC is increasing. In July 2026, DTCC began real-time trading of tokenized securities with over 50 institutions, Securitize listed its stock SECZ on the New York Stock Exchange while issuing tokenized stocks across multiple chains including Avalanche and Solana. Centralized exchanges like Binance (bStocks) and Kraken (xStocks) are also expanding their tokenized stock products across several countries. By mid-July 2026, the market cap of the tokenized stock category reached $2.3 billion, nearly doubling since first surpassing $1 billion in March.

Trading volume of these assets on decentralized exchanges remains small compared to DeFi, with most collateral usage still relying on permissioned and whitelisted structures. Deeper on-chain integration, which could match the composability of DeFi, might still require more time. Currently, the industry remains in the stage of proving the practicality of on-chain asset management.

4.4. Prediction Markets: From Simple Gambling to Market-Dominating Trends

Prediction markets are on-chain contract markets where participants bet on the outcomes of real-world events. This category has a market cap of $9.58 billion, making it the newest formation among the five areas covered here.

Also noteworthy is that the two platforms that actually dominate this industry, Kalshi and Polymarket, have not issued tokens.

Kalshi: Cumulative financing of $2 billion, valuation of $22 billion, which is 11 times its funding amount. Its June trading volume was $31.5 billion (up 87.4% month-over-month), surpassing this valuation.

Polymarket: Cumulative financing of about $1.6 billion, valuation of $9 billion. In June, its main platform outside the U.S. had a trading volume of $10.26 billion (up 45% month-over-month), and its annualized revenue has surpassed $1 billion since being authorized to operate in the U.S.

The World Cup presents both an opportunity and a challenge for prediction market platforms. It drove a sharp increase in trading volume in June, but after the finals on July 19, the total open contracts across the two platforms dropped nearly 20% from a peak of about $2 billion in early July. As sports contracts accounted for about 80% of total trading volume during the event, volume may remain weak ahead of the next significant event, the U.S. midterm elections.

Regulatory risks also persist. On July 21, 2026, a Washington State court issued a preliminary injunction prohibiting Kalshi from selling sports event contracts, reasoning that this constitutes illegal gambling under state law.

Before 2024, prediction markets did not even exist as a separate category. Today, they are the fastest-growing segment of the crypto market. The uniqueness of this field lies in the fact that its growth is not evidenced by token market cap or TVL, but by real trading volume and income, which comes from attracting users outside the crypto circle to the on-chain ecosystem. This is one of the clearest examples to date of blockchain technology becoming a part of everyday use for a broad audience.

4.5. Meme Tokens: From Simple Speculative Assets to Liquidity-Driving Strategies

The final area is meme tokens. Unlike the other fields mentioned above, meme tokens have no clear utility. Their value comes from community and attention. This category has a market cap of $25.68 billion, which is larger than that of prediction markets.

Dogecoin ranks first with $11.22 billion, followed by Shiba Inu at $2.5 billion. These two tokens together account for 53.4% of the total market cap of the meme token category, indicating that once tokens gain symbolic status in this field, however loosely, they tend to maintain that status.

The emphasis on Pump.fun and CASHCAT is not due to their market cap rankings but for their symbolic significance.

Pump.fun: Market cap of $806 million, notable for raising $600 million in 12 minutes during its public sale in July 2025.

CASHCAT (Robinhood chain): Its market cap increased over 2100% in a week after launch, peaking over $200 million before dropping about 75% to $59 million on July 17.

As exemplified by the Robinhood chain case in July 2026, the meme token narrative can still temporarily attract liquidity across an entire chain, a pattern seen in previous cycles. The TVL of the Robinhood chain expanded sharply, from $17 million on July 3 to $312 million on July 13, with daily DEX trading volume peaking at $846.8 million, primarily driven by the meme token $CASHCAT.

The utility of meme tokens lies in attracting early users and simplifying entry. New chains or applications can use meme tokens to quickly build communities and naturally encourage activities such as bridging assets or trading on DEX. Some of these users attracted in this way may continue to use other DeFi services or applications within the ecosystem and remain active, making meme tokens an effective entry point and marketing channel.

Ultimately, meme tokens function more like initial tools for rapidly gathering users and liquidity rather than long-term hold assets. The key to success is whether early interest can convert into real product usage and persistent retention within the ecosystem.

5. What Projects Need to Survive

Projects that have survived to date have gained genuine demand that keeps users coming back and have evidenced this through clear performance metrics such as trading volume, TVL, and fee income.

Demand in the 2026 market is concentrated at two different ends of the spectrum. One end is the speculative demand seeking high volatility and immediate returns. Meme tokens, perpetual contract DEX, and prediction markets effectively absorb this demand through rapid trading cycles and high capital turnover. The other end reflects real financial demand for stable custody, transfer, and efficient management of assets. Stablecoins, RWA, and DeFi infrastructure are fulfilling core financial functions such as payments, collateralization, yield generation, and risk management.

When a sustainable income structure and network effects are added to this foundation, true product-market fit emerges. Token prices may generate initial attention, but long-term survival is determined by frequency of use, retained capital, income, and operational capacity.

The KBW to be held in late September 2026 will provide an up-close view of this transition. Bo Hines, CEO of Tether U.S., Jeff Yan, co-founder of Hyperliquid, Johann Kerbrat, senior vice president of Robinhood Crypto, and Christine Moy of Apollo are key figures driving these changes who will take the stage together. Through dialogues with leaders from the stablecoin, perpetual contract DEX, and asset tokenization and RWA sectors, attendees will get to witness the transformation that has so far only been visible in data.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。