On May 19, 2026, the Financial Services Agency of Japan pressed a subtly significant "switch" in Kasumigaseki: by announcing the "Cabinet Office Ordinance to Partially Amend the Ordinance concerning Operators of Electronic Payment Means, etc.", it provided a clear legal basis for specific foreign-issued, trust-structured crypto payment assets for the first time. According to this new regulation, starting from June 1, 2026, any foreign trust-type asset anchored to the value of legal currency can be categorized as an "electronic payment means" under the "Funds Settlement Act," as long as the regulatory framework of the jurisdiction it operates in is deemed "equivalent" to Japan's current system. This allows registered electronic payment means and other transaction operators to handle and circulate these assets compliantly within Japan. For a long time, Japan had only established a complete regulatory track for domestically issued stable-type assets, while foreign crypto dollar-type products navigated between principled discussions and regulatory gray areas. Now, the Financial Services Agency has officially opened the market for these foreign trust-type assets while simultaneously erecting a fence at the entrance with "equivalence" assessments and high-standard compliance conditions. Japan's choice is not simply about openness or rejection; rather, it is a deliberately narrow path, open only to a few potentially qualified entities.

Overseas Crypto Dollars Languishing in a Legal Gray Area

In Japan, the "Funds Settlement Act" has long drawn a clear boundary for stable-type assets issued locally: who can issue them, how funds are custodianship, and under what regulated environment they circulate—all of these have codified rules. However, the same set of laws has remained silent regarding the crypto dollars pouring in from abroad for a long time. They have not been clearly recognized as "electronic payment means" nor listed under other categories; instead, they have been relegated to a drawer labeled "principled discussions." As a result, technically, these assets can cross the border into Japan and enter various payment or trading scenarios, but legally, they always lack definition, residing in an awkward space where they "can be used, but it is uncertain whether it is legal"—any transaction hangs by an invisible sword of compliance.

According to a single source, C, yet to be verified, the Financial Services Agency publicly solicited opinions from the beginning of February to early March 2026 on how to manage these foreign-issued products under the existing framework. However, when the time came to pen the document, the regulators did not draft a new law but chose to amend the old one—by revising the Cabinet Office Ordinance related to electronic payment means to include "specific foreign-issued trust-type stablecoins based on a regulatory framework with equivalence to the Japanese system" under the scope of electronic payment means in the "Funds Settlement Act." For overseas crypto dollars, this means being pulled back from the outer edge of the system to within the legal text, filling in the long-empty territory with color, and reserving a repeatable, gradually extendable regulatory path for broader future openings of such assets.

The Equivalence Gate Falls: Who Can Enter Japan's Payment System

The so-called "opening the door" does not mean issuing admission tickets indiscriminately to all overseas crypto dollars. The revised ordinance is quite explicit: only "specific foreign-issued trust-type stablecoins based on a regulatory framework with equivalence to the Japanese system" are considered electronic payment means under the "Funds Settlement Act." In other words, Japan has set a baseline—first, check if the jurisdiction has a regulatory system that meets or exceeds Japan's in terms of capital adequacy, risk isolation, and holder protection, and then see if you issue using a trust structure with separated asset custody and operations. Otherwise, even qualifying for classification as "electronic payment means" is out of the question.

Even if one crosses this first "equivalence" threshold, to circulate truly within Japan, they must integrate with local infrastructure. The Financial Services Agency pointed out in the announcement that these foreign trust-type assets must operate through registered electronic payment means and transaction operators, which will become the only legal conduit. According to verified information from a single source, C, internal discussions among regulators may include key assessment points such as whether the assets are fully backed, if they undergo regular independent audits, and whether the issuing party has an obligation to share information with its local regulatory authorities. If these ideas are written into subsequent detailed regulations, the so-called "equivalence" would not just be a formal institutional comparison, but a set of verifiable hard indicators. This means even large overseas issuers, whose home country's regulation is viewed as overly lenient, may be barred from the new gateways of Japan's payment system. Who can actually cross this threshold will depend on how regulators define "equivalent to Japan" in practice.

The Market Eyes the Fate of USDC and USDT

After the document's release on May 19, the discussion did not remain at an abstract "equivalence" level; the market quickly concretized the question around a few names: USDC, USDT, and other mainstream dollar-pegged assets were repeatedly brought up as case studies. Some analysis points out (according to a single source, C, pending verification) that models like USDC, which use trust structures to manage underlying assets and emphasize regular audit disclosures, are formally closer to the regulatory tracks established for domestic issuers in Japan; in contrast, those crypto dollars perceived as having lower transparency regarding asset backing, reserve composition, and information disclosure are seen by many market participants as having greater uncertainty regarding their "equivalence" review prospects. It is important to emphasize that these judgments are merely market interpretations and single-source views, and do not represent an official stance of the Financial Services Agency; they cannot be retrospectively interpreted as factual conclusions about whether a specific product is "easier" or "harder" to pass.

The real key information gap lies in the fact that to date, the Financial Services Agency has not published any specific list of products that have completed the equivalence assessment, and the research brief explicitly prohibits stating that USDC or USDT and any single asset has been "approved." In other words, even though the new regulations will come into effect on June 1, 2026, and the legal category of electronic payment means has opened the entrance for qualifying foreign trust-type stable assets, when ordinary users will actually and legally be able to access these crypto dollars through payment institutions or trading platforms in Japan still depends on the pace and outcome of subsequent case evaluations, and this timetable remains entirely in the hands of the regulators.

Cross-Border Payments and Exchanges Face New Game Rules

For domestic payment institutions and crypto asset exchanges in Japan, this new threshold of "equivalence + trust-type," once specific products genuinely cross over, the plot of cross-border settlement and dollar exposure management will no longer be limited to traditional interbank and foreign exchange channels. The Financial Services Agency has already pointed out in the announcement that this amendment is designed to provide a legal basis for specific foreign-issued, trust-structured stable-type assets to be compliantly processed and circulated in Japan by registered electronic payment means and other transaction operators; starting from June 1, 2026, this category will be officially written into the "Funds Settlement Act." Based on this foundation, the analysis can be made: once any product is recognized as an "electronic payment means," Japanese payment institutions, wallet service providers, and exchanges, after obtaining the relevant licenses, may theoretically directly embed these crypto dollars into cross-border payments, customer balance management, and even proprietary trading, thus moving part of the dollar liquidity and exchange rate risk management onto the regulated blockchain or ledger systems. However, to date, the Financial Services Agency has not publicly disclosed any specific targets that have passed the equivalence assessment, and this potential restructuring remains at the stage of institutional possibility; the true operational path will depend on the design details and regulatory附加条件 of the first batch of recognized products.

Shifting the perspective back to the global stage, Japan's choice stands out. The EU's MiCA has already established a unified regulatory framework for certain asset-backed tokens, shaping rules from within the EU market, while Japan retains the skeleton of its own "Funds Settlement Act" and, through the identification of "equivalence to the Japanese system" and added trust structure requirements, brings specific foreign trust-type crypto dollars into the category of "electronic payment means." From the perspective of compliance-oriented issuers, this design both tightens the threshold—requiring proof of asset backing, audits, and cross-border regulatory collaboration conditions to meet equivalence (according to a single source, C, yet to be verified)—and opens a window to a substantial market in a mature economy (analysis): those who can first adjust their structure to fit Japanese preferences and submit a regulatory equivalence response that regulators agree to are more likely to occupy a key position in Japan's cross-border payment channels and local exchanges' dollar liquidity pools in the coming years.

A Door has Opened a Crack, but the True Winners Have Yet to Appear

Under the new regulations announced by the Financial Services Agency of Japan on May 19, 2026, which will officially come into effect on June 1, 2026, specific foreign-issued, trust-based crypto dollars, constrained by a regulatory framework deemed "equivalent" to Japan's system, have for the first time been incorporated into the category of electronic payment means in the "Funds Settlement Act," providing an unprecedented entry point for foreign trust-type crypto dollars on a legal level. However, this door is not low: the core condition is condensed into "equivalence," meaning only products that can align with Japan's current framework in terms of regulatory architecture, investor protection, and operational governance have the opportunity to truly cross the threshold. Currently, the biggest gaps exist in three areas: first, the detailed standards for equivalence assessment have not been made public, and the outside world does not know the extent to which regulators require "mirroring" of Japan's system; second, the Financial Services Agency has not announced any specific foreign trust-type crypto dollar as having passed the assessment or been approved for inclusion in the electronic payment means system; as of the current date, the list of the first "gate passers" remains completely unknown; third, even with June 1 approaching, the pace of case approvals and the timeline from approval to actual implementation in Japanese payment institutions and local exchanges remain unpredictable. In this context, the various lists of projects that are said to be "most beneficial" are essentially still speculation rather than regulatory conclusions. The next thing to closely watch will be whether the Financial Services Agency releases more detailed equivalence assessment guidelines, how the first approved product adopts its trust and custody structure, and how Japan and foreign regulatory authorities implement information sharing and collaborative mechanisms. As these pieces of the puzzle gradually come together, the true biggest winners emerging from behind this newly opened narrow gate will become clear.

Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance Welfare Group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。