There is now a saying that modern genetic testing technology proves that Guangxu is not of the Aisin Gioro family’s genes. If this is true, the problem must lie with Kangxi, as other emperors never left the palace during their childhood, making the inheritance orderly.

From the portraits, Nurhaci, Huang Taiji, and Shunzhi all have square faces, while Kangxi has a pointed face; saying he has a monkey-like chin is not an exaggeration, the variation is indeed very large. The later emperors—Jiaqing, Daoguang, Xianfeng, Tongzhi, Guangxu, and Puyi—all had non-square faces. Although Kangxi had smallpox, which led to a significant change in appearance, the shape of his face would not change. I have seen many people with smallpox when they were young, and at most, they had craters all over their faces, but the shape of their faces did not change.

Of course, from the portraits, Kangxi does resemble Hong Chengchou, indeed. But to say that Hong Chengchou had an affair with Xiaozhuang and gave birth to Kangxi is taking it too far. A ten-month pregnancy and a crying baby; how could that be kept a secret?

If it is said that Hong Chengchou replaced the already deceased Kangxi with his own son, given Hong Chengchou’s status at that time, it could indeed be maneuvered, but it would certainly not be possible for Xiaozhuang to have given birth.

If Kangxi was replaced, then what I said a few days ago about the Qing Dynasty actually being ruled by Han people is even more correct.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。