Since February in the East Eight Time Zone, the Brazilian House of Representatives Economic Development Committee proposed a Bitcoin strategic reserve bill named RESbit/RESBit, which has caused a strong tremor in the global cryptocurrency and macroeconomic circles. The proposal aims to create a "Bitcoin vault" in Brazil, managed by the Treasury, within five years, and reports have even mentioned an ambitious goal of accumulating 1 million BTC, pushing an asset that was originally seen as a marginal speculative item directly into the core of national reserve assets. While Congress loudly claims that it wants to use Bitcoin to reshape the global financial narrative, the Brazilian Central Bank publicly opposes the large-scale inclusion of Bitcoin into the national balance sheet, worried that high volatility would impact monetary policy and credibility. This confrontation transforms the "sovereign digital asset strategy" from a concept into a real power and risk game. This article will trace the clues of why Brazil is betting on Bitcoin, what the Central Bank fears, and whether this will change the collective imagination of developing countries about digital assets.
The thrilling leap from marginal asset to treasury chip
● Strategic idea: The basic idea of the RESbit bill is to officially recognize Bitcoin as a national strategic asset, to be uniformly managed by the Treasury, creating a tangible "national Bitcoin vault." This means that BTC is no longer just a civil investment target, but is incorporated into the sovereign asset portfolio and discussed alongside traditional foreign exchange and precious metals. The goal of the bill is to institutionalize the allocation, binding Brazil to the future global digital asset landscape.
● The radical nature of the one million target: There is a single report mentioning that the proposers hope to accumulate at least 1 million BTC as a strategic reserve within 5 years. However, this number has not yet been repeatedly confirmed in authoritative texts, so it must be viewed as a radical and unverified goal rather than a confirmed provision written into the bill. Even achieving only part of this goal, based on current circulation and price ranges, would be a highly symbolic large-scale national holding, enough to change global expectations regarding the relationship between sovereign institutions and Bitcoin.
● Geopolitical financial symbol impact: If the goal of one million BTC is close to being realized, Brazil's potential holdings will surpass the cryptocurrency asset attitudes and layouts of major countries like China and the United States indicated in public information. This is not just a structural experiment of the balance sheet but also a narrative challenge to the traditional geopolitical financial order — an emerging economy attempting to use decentralized assets to fill its gap in the discourse power within the dollar-dominated system, even if this supplementation is more a display of symbolic financial muscle.
● Betting on mature asset classes: The ambition of RESbit is not to make a reckless bet during the early stages of cryptocurrency, but to bet on an asset class that already has a global scale. In 2021, the total market value of cryptocurrency assets once broke through 3 trillion US dollars, with Bitcoin long occupying the market value leader position. This makes the idea of "incorporating BTC into national reserves" no longer seem completely marginalized like it did a decade ago, but more like betting on a long-term digital asset standard that has been partially priced by global markets but is still full of uncertainty.
Simultaneous tax reduction and payment: How Brazil...
● Dual-track design of tax incentives: According to secondary sources like the Planet Daily, the RESbit bill includes two key incentives: the first is to allow the use of Bitcoin for tax payments, and the second is arrangements for capital gains tax exemptions or reductions under certain conditions. This combination design of "allowing BTC to fulfill national obligations while providing benefits on the appreciation side" aims to guide Bitcoin assets that are currently held overseas or on-chain back into Brazil’s regulatory and tax perspectives from both compliance and revenue sides.
● Encouraging repatriation and compliance: Once BTC can be legally used for tax payments while enjoying benefits on capital gains under specific circumstances, holders will have a stronger incentive to declare their holdings and trading records, rather than remaining in gray areas or foreign platforms. For Brazil, this helps to transform "invisible assets" into "measurable assets," enhancing the transparency and localization of on-chain activities, laying a data foundation for future financial products and regulatory frameworks around BTC.
● Concept of treasury management and cautious technology: The brief mentions that if a national reserve is formed in the future, it will be managed by the Treasury using cold wallets, multi-signature methods, etc., to enhance safety and prevent single point failures. However, current public information remains at the principle level, without providing verifiable specific technical architecture and operational processes. Without authoritative details, the outside world cannot and should not speculate about its wallet structure, key management, or third-party custody arrangements, to avoid misreading the concept as a finalized, refined plan.
● Possible industrial clustering effect: If the three lines of tax reduction, tax payment, and reserve are implemented simultaneously, Brazilian trading platforms, custody institutions, mining, and computing service providers could accelerate their clustering due to their proximity to a "national-level customer." Tax relaxation and policy certainty will magnetize regional liquidity and talents; simultaneously, compliant lending, custody, and insurance services derived from the treasury reserves may also have the opportunity to develop locally, pushing Brazil from a "participant" to a "hub" in the Latin American cryptocurrency industry chain.
The Central Bank pours cold water: monetary credibility and high...
● The Central Bank's public opposition: Compared to Congress’s radical stance, the Brazilian Central Bank has explicitly expressed opposition to including Bitcoin in large-scale national reserves. Its public position emphasizes that Bitcoin's high volatility poses risks to the execution of monetary policy and monetary credibility, and this attitude is not merely a technical disagreement, but a structural resistance based on maintaining stability of the local currency, inflation targets, and the robustness of the financial system toward a new asset.
● Congressional aggressiveness vs Central Bank conservatism: On one side, Congress is promoting a national strategy for digital assets, hoping to tell grand stories of "financial technology modernization" and "integration with the global digital economy" through BTC; on the other side, the Central Bank, with inflation, exchange rates, and financial stability as core KPIs, is more concerned about whether the local currency anchor will be dragged down by high-volatility assets. This dual-line game makes RESbit not just a legal text, but a real dispute over the division of labor in the future financial order between legislative powers and monetary authorities.
● Impact of volatility and balance sheet: Over the past decade, Bitcoin has experienced multiple rounds of daily volatility of dozens of percentage points and extreme market behavior cycles of "halving-doubling," which is almost unseen in sovereign asset balance sheets. The Central Bank worries that once BTC occupies too high a proportion in national reserves, its severe price adjustments could cause a large fluctuation in the nominal value of official reserves, disrupting external expectations of the local currency's safety net and solvency, thus weakening the credibility and transmission effects of monetary policy.
● Value conflict not positional extremity: From the divergences between the Central Bank and Congress, it is evident that the core of this debate is not about "love or hate for cryptocurrency," but rather the value conflict between "sovereign digital asset strategy" and "traditional monetary stability." Congress hopes to obtain new growth narratives and international visibility through the former, while the Central Bank insists on the latter to guard price and financial system bottom lines. The clash of these two logics within the same national apparatus makes Brazil a frontier sample for examining whether sovereignty can safely embrace decentralized assets.
Brazil wants to become a Bitcoin vault, while the world...
● Potential rewriting of the global holding map: If RESbit is ultimately passed and gradually implemented, Brazil's position in the global Bitcoin holding map will undergo a qualitative change. Transitioning from an emerging economy primarily known for commodities and traditional foreign exchange reserves to one of the few countries daring to hold large amounts of BTC on a sovereign level is bound to provide an "alternative model" for other developing countries — especially for those dissatisfied with the dollar system and unable to gain equal discourse power in traditional financial institutions.
● Using reserves to seize the narrative: Compared to the current more regulatory, punitive, or prudential observation attitudes of China and the United States, Brazil holding BTC on a large scale would equate to using "reserve determination" to seize part of the narrative power of the future financial system. Even if its economic scale and traditional reserve size cannot compare with great powers, taking the initiative in accumulating in the cryptocurrency dimension could place it at a higher starting point in industry system design, regional pricing power, and discourse systems.
● Diversification or new risk factors: From the supporters' perspective, Bitcoin reserves can be packaged as a diversifying supplement to the traditional foreign exchange reserve structure, offering a form of "digital gold" risk hedge in the context of long-term inflation and currency overissuance. However, for rating agencies and some international organizations, such high volatility, market sentiment-driven assets could also be seen as additional risk factors: if proportions are uncontrolled or risk management is insufficient, it may aggravate the uncertainty of sovereign credit rather than alleviate it.
● Modernized discourse and image engineering: One of the primary proponents of RESbit, Federal Congressman Eros Biondini, emphasized the need to "modernize Brazil's financial and technological management to align the nation with the global digital economy." This political discourse serves to garner public opinion for the bill domestically and also acts as a form of "technology finance Public Relations": by linking with cutting-edge assets, it sends a signal to voters and international capital markets that Brazil is willing to participate in the next round of digital economy competition. Regardless of the final holding scale, this posture itself is a form of political asset.
The legislative game has just begun, Bitcoin...
RESbit is currently still in the legislative proposal stage, and it still has a complete path of deliberation, hearings, and potential revisions before becoming a binding legal text. There is also currently no authoritative timeline for its passage in public records. In the short term, it seems more like a policy probe with high stakes rather than a fact that can be directly counted into Brazil’s national balance sheet. Congress hopes to use Bitcoin to tell stories of national digitization and financial upgrades, while the Central Bank remains vigilant from the perspective of monetary credibility and macroeconomic stability, and market participants seek institutional dividends or signals of risk in this national-level experiment—this three-party tension undoubtedly serves as a barometer for other emerging economies. Going forward, external observers need to pay close attention to whether the details of the bill text are gradually disclosed, how risks are handled in hearings and revisions, whether there is any coordination shift in the attitudes of the Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance, and how international institutions and rating agencies respond to Brazil's strategic probe. Ultimately, how far will Brazil go between sovereign credit and decentralized assets? And for the other countries watching all this unfold, will they choose to follow suit or continue weighing costs and benefits in observation?
Join our community, let's discuss and become stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh
OKX benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
