Article Author: Federico Carrone, Roberto Catalan

Article Compiler: Block unicorn

Ethereum is rising as a universal financial backend, reducing the cost and complexity of building financial services while increasing speed and security. For decades, the internet has accelerated communication but has failed to establish a neutral system to define ownership or enforce obligations. Economic activities have shifted online, yet there is a lack of corresponding rights, records, and jurisdictional mechanisms. Ethereum fills this gap by embedding these functions into software and enforcing them through a distributed validator set.

Markets rely on property rights, which in turn depend on reliable systems to record ownership, support transfers, and enforce obligations. Prices convey scarcity and preferences, enabling large-scale coordination. Technological advancements continuously lower the costs of information transmission and action synchronization. Ethereum further extends this model by reducing the costs of establishing and verifying ownership across borders.

From Internet Native to Global Infrastructure

The early innovation of Ethereum was the introduction of programmable digital assets with explicit economic properties. Issuers can set monetary rules, design scarcity, and integrate assets into applications. Before Ethereum, such experiments required building networks and persuading others to provide security, a process limited to technically strong teams. Ethereum replaced the repetitive construction of infrastructure with a shared security mechanism and a universal environment, transforming issuance from a capital-intensive activity to a software-driven one.

A more profound development is the recognition that Ethereum can reconstruct traditional financial services in a more transparent and operationally lighter form. Financial institutions invest significant resources in authorization, reconciliation, monitoring, dispute resolution, and reporting. Consumer interfaces are built on complex internal systems designed to prevent errors and misconduct. Ethereum replaces some of these mechanisms with a shared ledger, a programmable execution environment, and cryptographic enforcement mechanisms. By delegating core functions to software rather than redundantly developing them within each institution, management complexity is reduced.

Ethereum alleviates the burden on institutions by providing a real-time updated shared ledger, programmable space for defining rules, and cryptographic enforcement mechanisms. It does not replace financial institutions but changes which parts of the financial system they must build themselves. Issuance becomes simpler, custody more secure, and management less dependent on proprietary infrastructure.

Software, Trust, and Reduced Friction

Some economists categorize transaction costs into three types of friction: triangulation, transfer, and trust. Triangulation involves how economic participants identify each other and reach agreements. Transfer involves how value flows between them. Trust involves the enforcement of obligations. Traditional financial architectures manage these frictions through scale, proprietary systems, and coordination among intermediaries.

Ethereum eliminates intermediaries, thereby reducing the aforementioned three frictions. Open markets support the discovery of assets and prices. Digital value can be settled globally in minutes without multi-layered intermediary banks. Obligations can be automatically executed and publicly verified. These functions do not replace institutional roles but shift some work from institutions to software, reducing costs and operational risks.

New entrants can benefit immediately. They can rely on infrastructure maintained by thousands of engineers without having to build their own settlement, custody, and execution systems. Business logic is transformed into code. Obligations can be automated. Settlement becomes instantaneous. Users retain custody. This expands the range of viable business models, enabling companies to serve markets that existing businesses consider too small or too complex.

Having a single global ledger also changes operational dynamics. Many institutions operate multiple databases, requiring frequent reconciliations and prone to errors. Ethereum maintains a continuously updated and immutable record. Redundancy and recoverability become default attributes rather than costly internal features.

Security follows the same pattern. Ethereum does not rely on protecting centralized databases but distributes verification work among numerous independent participants. Tampering with historical records requires large-scale coordination, which is extremely costly. Trust arises from system design rather than institutional commitments.

New Financial Services and Global Coverage

These features give rise to seemingly traditional services with vastly different cost structures. International transfers can use digital dollars instead of intermediary bank networks. Loans can enforce collateral rules through code. Local payment systems can achieve interoperability without proprietary standards. Individuals in economically unstable regions can store value in digital tools without considering the fragility of local currency systems.

Functions such as clearing, custody, reconciliation, monitoring, and execution shift from organizational processes to shared software. Companies can focus on product design and distribution without maintaining complex internal infrastructure. As infrastructure is shared, scaling is achieved by acquiring users. Value accumulates on applications rather than on redundant internal systems.

This impact is most pronounced in markets with fragile financial systems. In economies with unstable currencies or slow payment networks, Ethereum can immediately enhance functionality. In developed markets, the benefits may seem incremental, but as more tools and processes become programmable, the benefits will continue to accumulate.

Institutional Transformation and Long-Term Dynamics

Many financial instruments exhibit heterogeneity. Corporate bonds are a typical example. Their terms vary based on maturity, coupon, covenants, collateral, and risk. Transactions rely on bilateral negotiations and intermediaries responsible for maintaining records and enforcing obligations. Ethereum can digitally represent these financial instruments, track ownership, and automatically execute terms. Contracts retain their specificity while management becomes standardized and interoperable.

This signals a shift in institutional architecture. Regulatory and legal systems remain crucial, but the boundaries of what businesses and software can enforce are changing. Institutions are evolving from infrastructure providers to service designers. The cost structures of companies maintaining traditional systems will diverge from those relying on shared infrastructure.

Ethereum has already operated as an alternative financial track. Its reliability, numerous independently developed clients, extensive real-world applications, active research community, and commitment to openness and verification distinguish it from other blockchain networks. These traits align with the requirements of enduring financial infrastructure.

Conclusion

Ethereum transforms core financial frictions into software functionalities. This changes the economic model for building and operating financial services. Talent and capital shift from operations to product design innovation. Institutions become leaner and more efficient. Companies adopting Ethereum will have lower operational costs and gain a competitive edge.

Technological change often begins in niche markets where existing businesses cannot meet demand. As systems mature and costs decline, broader applications become possible. Ethereum has followed this path. It initially served the internet-native community, then expanded to emerging markets to meet users' needs for reliable financial tools, and now it is working to elevate mainstream markets by simplifying the creation and operation processes of financial companies.

The deeper significance is that software is gradually becoming the organizing principle of financial infrastructure. Ethereum embodies this transformation. Whether it can become the foundation of financial infrastructure will depend on the adaptability of regulation and institutions, but economic incentives are increasingly favoring open, verifiable, and resilient systems.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。