Case Study comparing a Manual Strategy (+0.193 ETH) vs. @DeFiSaver Automation (+0.269 ETH) Manual Strategy: Leveraged Aave Strat • Boost near $1,550 • Repay near $1,700 • missed one entry during tennis, bought higher before bed, had to stay awake waiting for rallies, hesitated when his sell target arrived + spent the week checking charts during work, dinner and sleep Total accumulated profit: 0.193 ETH DeFi Saver Automation: exact same Leveraged Aave Strat • Used target-price Boost and Repay triggers • Zero managment / stress / staying up late Total Accumulated Profit: 0.268906 ETH nearly 40% more... This isn't because DeFi Saver predicted the market better but because it executed decisions the moment ETH reached the specified target Humans feel emotion, which is great in many aspects of life...except when it comes to trading, where doubt/fomo/hesitation (and lack of sleep) can play a large part in if a strategy succeeds or fails over the past year: • ETH’s average open to close move was 2.49% • average intraday high to low range was 5% most of the movement happens inside the candle and that means (for a human trader) building your whole day around the market however, with DeFi Saver automation, you decide once and boom you get all your time back + exact execution PLUS target-price Boost and Repay are only some of the DeFi Saver Automation features available across 10+ integrated protocols (go check all their features now) Check out the full detailed case study here: https://blog.defisaver.com/eth-never-sleeps-but-you-should/?utm_source=Linnx&utm_medium=XArticle&utm_campaign=LinnX&utm_id=linnX dc: Linn is an ambassador for DeFi Saver because they help users safely make much higher profits on their assets(🉐 Crypto Linn)