My first job in life had an interesting task: to help my boss with ghostwriting. The so-called ghostwriting is actually when the boss writes several bullet points about the theme and core points and sends them to me, and then I am responsible for "filling in the flesh". After receiving the question, I started working: searching for information, supplementing arguments, finding examples, organizing the context, and then flipping through the boss's previous articles, imitating his tone, and stringing together the entire content. To be honest, I did a good job at that time. The boss usually only needed to make a few minor adjustments to finalize the draft. Looking back, that mission was essentially a GPT-1.0 (human flesh version) that was more of a cannon. Ten years later, I switched to the other side and became the role of my former boss Now when I write articles myself, I always lose the outline and main idea first, and then ask AI to help generate paragraphs, fill in details, help find information, and even make it imitate my tone. Actually, there's no need to worry about whether the article was written by AI. The essence of AI is just like me before: whatever you give it, it amplifies. The material you throw in is gold, which will help you polish the gold brighter. But if you throw garbage, I'm sorry, AI can't save the entire article. It will only seriously write garbage into a bunch of logically strange things. The core viewpoint is the soul. AI is just a tool.