Thank you very much Danny @ agintender for his in-depth analysis and detailed exploration of the algorithm design differences of Bitget. I strongly agree with this perspective and would like to take this opportunity to share our design philosophy and the original intention behind it (as I am not a professional, the following content is provided by the product team). 1. More conservative liquidation logic: Compared to his aggressive triggering mechanism, Bitget has designed a buffer on the liquidation curve to reduce the risk of a "waterfall liquidation" chain reaction. Especially during severe market fluctuations, providing users with additional protection and reducing unnecessary losses. 2. A more transparent funding rate sampling mechanism: We use publicly available data from mainstream on chain indices such as BN, CB, and OKX, while introducing abnormal volatility filtering logic to minimize market manipulation. Ensure fairness in funding rates, allowing users to have a clearer understanding of market dynamics. 3. Smooth dynamic margin adjustment: The dynamic margin formula adapts to market risk, especially during periods of high volatility, providing greater margin for small positions. Help users maintain more stable fund management, especially in leveraged trading. Perhaps these adjustments will not bring immediate benefits, but we have been optimizing algorithm design, improving trading fairness, and creating a trading environment that is closer to real market trends (safe, transparent, stable, and trustworthy), rather than just pursuing high leverage short-term incentives. Sincerely welcome everyone to provide more opinions and suggestions for our products, to help us do better 🙏