Humanity: The founder who cursed when questioned, and the truth behind the collective backlash It is not surprising that Terence Kwok, the founder of the Humanity project, broke the defense and publicly used vulgar language to launch personal attacks on AB Twitter. It's hard to believe that this is a CEO who claims to be valued at $1 billion. It's ridiculous that while community users were criticized in tears, Kwok felt "wronged" first. But if you understand the routine of this project along the way, you will find that people really only get angry and embarrassed when they are exposed, and this reaction is perfectly reasonable. Next, let's summarize: _________ 1、 Top contributors become beggars, the so-called 'community co construction' is just a carefully designed PUA scenario After announcing the completion of a $30 million financing and a valuation of up to $1 billion, Humanity launched a high-profile "Fairdrop" airdrop and declared its commitment to community building and autonomy. Token economics specifies that 12% of tokens will be allocated to the community. But when the airdrop is actually distributed, what is revealed is the fact of harvest: one ⃣ I have worked hard for a year to complete the check-in task, and the airdrop value is 1u, which is already considered good. However, there are still various reasons why I am not eligible for zero airdrops. two ⃣ The official mod that worked hard to maintain the community and create content on a daily basis was sent away by "zero airdrop". three ⃣ At the same time, multiple ghost addresses with up to 40000 $H airdrops were discovered on the chain, with no interaction or contribution records. Obviously, this cannot be explained by "technical errors", it only indicates: one ⃣ The project may not have even intended to fulfill the 12% community allocation commitment, and the so-called co construction is just an empty slogan two ⃣ Ghost addresses are the true 'predetermined winners', and users who make serious contributions are just cheap beggars sacrificed three ⃣ The initial claim of Fairdrop was just a slogan for PUA strategy However, it is not the first time that the community is not treated as human. Let's turn our attention back to Terence Kwok's historical background. _________ 2、 Failed entrepreneurship burns $200 million, but a different narrative makes a comeback? Terence Kwok is not the first time to undertake such a "unicorn" project. Related media reports: https://news.marsbit.co/20240517161821412132.html In short, the reasons for the failures are unremarkable, but in the face of this series of catastrophic failures, Kwok's response is surprising. He said, "At most, going back to school, failing to start a business is just getting an MBA. ” This statement exposed his true mentality: financing is a scholarship, a testing ground for entrepreneurial games, and investors' money is just "tuition". And this time, he changed the track, put on the Web3 vest, and came back with the old script to kill again. The $200 million disaster is now being replicated on Humanity, but this time the 'investors' have become the time, data, and trust of thousands of ordinary Web3 retail investors. _________ 3、 Witch screening has become a farce, PUA users contribute, and privacy data risks are huge Humanity claims to use a "zero knowledge+palm print recognition" dual insurance mechanism to resist witch attacks. What is the result? According to community feedback: one ⃣ The actual technology was assembled from the defective technology of a certain access control company in Shenzhen; two ⃣ Single person can repeatedly verify multiple numbers, and the batch pass rate of scripts is 99%! The so-called 'witch prevention' is essentially non-existent; In addition, over the past year, Humanity has frequently conducted "time limited form filling" activities under the pretext of "anti witch": in fact, these forms are just tools used by the project to maintain false prosperity, and airdrop distribution does not refer to these records at all. What is even more disturbing is that Humanity explicitly benchmarks Worldcoin, but its risk control in privacy regulation is almost in a state of 'naked running'. Worldcoin has been investigated by multiple governments due to privacy risks; The domestically produced palm print technology used by Humanity is not only a defective product, but also the compliance of its data storage and transmission path has not been disclosed to this day. From treating the community as a nobody, to using "co construction" as a shield, to using it as a disposable, lying, and PUA habit, Humanity has completely trampled on the trust mechanism of Web3. The so-called palmprint system does not recognize real humans, but rather recognizes humans who are willing to give it away for free. In the face of facts and community voices, if Humanity does not want to become a street mouse, it should respond openly and rationally to the community's doubts, rather than resorting to verbal abuse and personal attacks. Neither quality nor responsibility.