Recently, many people have been asking me how to view the new players in the Base ecosystem @ b3dotfun? Under the guidance of former Coinbase employees, can this L3 designed specifically for on chain games truly break through the "island" dilemma of Web3 games? Come on, let me talk in detail: ——Open game web3 new concept The concept of "open games" proposed by B3 has a clear goal: to break the current isolated state of Web3 games. The current situation is indeed like this. Look at top blockchain games such as Axie Infinity, StepN, Parallel, etc., which one is not creating a closed loop in their own ecosystem? Users have to switch between different chains, handle different tokens, and adapt to different wallets to play different games, resulting in a fragmented experience. The solution for B3 is to use the GameChains architecture to maintain the independence of each game while achieving interoperability. For example, Parallel's Prime chain and Infiniods' God chain can both run independently on B3, but the underlying layer can share liquidity and user incentives. The idea of "having both needs and demands" is quite ideal, it mainly depends on whether it can be implemented. The problem is that in order for GameChains to truly achieve interoperability, all game players need to reach consensus on technical standards, asset definitions, economic models, and other aspects. And this is not a technical issue at all, it is a matter of profit distribution. Fortunately, B3 does have inherent advantages backed by the Coinbase ecosystem, with Base's traffic entry and compliance endorsement, which can indeed attract many game players to actively join. ——The combination of L3 architecture and chain abstraction technology From a technical architecture perspective, B3 has chosen a relatively stable but distinctive route. As an L3 on the Base, the cost of a single transaction is controlled at around $0.001, which is indeed very attractive for blockchain games. B3's AnySpend technology allows users to instantly access cross chain assets through a single account, without the need to manually switch networks or bridge tokens. In other words, it is essentially a hybrid mode of "sharding+cross chain", where each GameChain maintains an independent state, but atomizes cross chain operations through the B3 unified settlement layer, avoiding the security risks and time delays of traditional bridging solutions. To put it simply, B3 is engaged in game operation business, not infrastructure business selling shovels. But the competition in the L3 track is fierce. You have the Base ecosystem, while others have Arbitrarum's Orbit and Polygon's CDK. The differentiation of B3's moat may lie in its deep understanding of game scenes and unified entrance http://BSMNT.fun Waiting for operational services. ——Tokenomics Design and Business Model B3's token allocation is relatively balanced: 34.2% goes to the community ecosystem, TGE only releases 19%, and the remaining portion has a 4-year lock up plan to avoid short-term selling pressure. The application scenarios of B3 include staking to obtain GameChains rewards, funding game projects, paying transaction fees, etc. The logic is relatively complete. From a business model perspective, B3 adopts a "platform economy+network effect" model. Unlike traditional game publishers who take a 30-70% commission, B3 attracts ecosystem participants through lower transaction rates (0.5%) and token incentives. The key value flywheel lies in: more game access → more player aggregation → stronger network effects → higher $B3 demand → more resource investment in the ecosystem. What I am more concerned about is the positioning of B3 as the "main circulating token of the entire chain gaming ecosystem". Nowadays, most blockchain games have their own token economy. How can B3 persuade these projects to accept $B3 as a universal currency? From a valuation perspective, B3 is more like a "gaming version of the App Store", with value not only coming from technology fees, but also from ecological scale effects. above. The biggest highlight of the B3 project is not technological innovation, but a systematic attempt to solve structural problems in the Web3 gaming industry. From the perspective of team background and resource integration ability, the Coinbase team, Base ecosystem support, and $21 million financing are all tangible advantages. 6 million active wallet users, over 80 game integrations, and 300 million cumulative transactions indicate that B3 does have a set of user acquisition and ecosystem building capabilities. The differentiation of B3 lies in the middle path of "neither completely relying on a single game IP nor doing pure technical infrastructure", which theoretically has greater imagination space, but also faces the risk of "not relying on both ends". Of course, the Web3 gaming industry itself is still in the early stages of exploration, and whether B3 can truly implement its vision of "open gaming" depends on whether it can continue to attract high-quality game content and real users. After all, no matter how good the infrastructure is, its value ultimately depends on the prosperity of the application ecosystem.