The weakness of Ethereum is one of the hottest topics of discussion in this bull market. From the perspective of the X platform, everyone has a feeling of 'mourning its misfortune and being angry about it' towards Ethereum. Solna is often compared to Ethereum because during this cycle, Solana performed better than Ethereum in terms of user engagement and attracting liquidity through MEME. Our team also had an informal discussion, and the reason why everyone thinks Ethereum's performance is not as good as Solana is that Ethereum has not had many applications that can involve users in this bull market. Without users, it will not attract money. Based on our past experience in the Internet - from the perspective of insight into user needs and providing what users need, Solana is very similar to the traditional Internet company's practice - to do things from a pragmatic perspective, and I will support whatever can bring users and money in. Stepn will explode in 2022, 2024 http://Pump.fun The explosive fire has confirmed this set of operational logic. On the other hand, the explosion of DeFi in 2020 and NFT in 2021 in Ethereum follows this logic. But the contradiction of Ethereum is that it is somewhat biased, or rather, its technological ideals are quite strong. Starting from 2022, Ethereum has been focusing on technology, including transitioning from PoW to PoS and discussing sharding and scaling. Of course, there were also many Layer2 applications, but even though Layer2 reduced the gas cost, no application that could be used was born. In the current blockchain industry, for participants, technology is important in practical terms, but participating in games to achieve the goal of making money is even more important. From a market economy perspective, users' choices are not wrong. Voting with feet is the most explicit answer. I don't know if it's good or bad, but in the blockchain industry, wherever there is liquidity, there are opportunities. Solana Ethereum