The airdrop mode needs to be reformed! Reach a consensus and change the chaos! This article will break through these chaos with one blow and propose an application idea that may completely improve the current airdrop mouse warehouse. All brothers who have been rejected will come together to push for reform! The airdrop model is no longer a pure incentive like uni, but a relatively mature form of token distribution, which should give investors higher transparency and true decentralization of power. From Bear Chain to BEVM, Elixir's mouse den, and then to Redstone's temporary rule change for bridge demolition The recent airdrops have become increasingly indifferent to the community and are simply taking advantage of the situation And the unfair distribution of these mouse traps and airdrops ultimately stems from the asymmetry of information and power, with the latter being particularly disgusting. Firstly, there is information asymmetry. We retail investors were completely unaware of the allocation of airdrop shares and even the issuance of coins from the beginning. As mentioned earlier, airdrops are no longer the era of Uni. If the airdrop during that period was' White Moonlight ', then the current projects are all' Princess Shangk '. In fact, you want my money (data, gas), I want your coins (b), belonging to one willing to fight and one willing to suffer. But the current situation is that these malicious "princess" project parties have taken our money, not only not allowing us to cheat but also throwing shame at us. Can they tolerate this?? Secondly, there is the most disgusting asymmetry of power. Redstone is the most typical example of power asymmetry! Redstone made temporary changes to the airdrop rules after entering the universe, resulting in a significant reduction of community shares. This approach completely violates the core principles of this industry, and is even more disgusting than those opaque web2 companies. Due to the transparency of data on the chain and the extreme asymmetry of rights, these garbage project parties can "take advantage of the situation" and modify the rules at any time to screen out real users from the most tricky perspective. At the same time, if they choose to screen out the "real gold" mouse den. Is the transparency of Web3 used in this way?? Spray back, curse back. Actually, a mechanism is still needed to limit the malicious ability of project parties while ensuring the interests of individual investors. Let's talk about my solution below: The first issue to be addressed is the asymmetric power of airdrops, where rules can be changed at any time based on the perception of others. 1. Establish a "Token Info Lockbox" token information lock box (platform). Any project that wants to issue coins in the future must send part or the entire set of tokenomics, including airdrop allocation shares, to this Lockbox platform. The content sent is locked on the chain and cannot be modified. Similar to token lock, it needs to be unlocked at a set time to view the specific content sent. Because the information on token allocation is locked and released in advance, it avoids the evil of temporary modifications to token allocation such as Redstone. This is very suitable for "Heavenly King" projects that like to pretend to be serious, and it can also help the project team avoid a lot of verbal disputes. 2. "Airdrop Info Lockbox" is a more specific locking method based on the token information lockbox mentioned earlier. Any project party who wishes to distribute through airdrops in the future must send the airdrop information to the platform in advance. Similarly, it cannot be modified and can only be unlocked and viewed for specific allocation content at the set time. This method is equivalent to informing retail investors in advance that the project has airdrops and the rules have been established and cannot be modified. It is very suitable for direct ball project parties who are openly involved in PUA, as well as friends who love to participate in deterministic projects. 3. Establish consensus. If you pay attention to my previous wording, you will definitely see the word 'must'. Why is it necessary? Because of consensus! If this article is fermented, once a consensus is reached on this mechanism, the project party that does not perform this operation will be abandoned by us individual investors. We can judge the reliability of the project by whether the project party uploads token or airdrop distribution information, as well as the upload time, and decide whether to proceed or not. This logic is like, if you attack a local dog and see a dog that hasn't locked the pool or lost its permissions in the early stages, you may not be able to secure a position, but if you lock it later, you can reassess the risk. This platform is like an airdrop version of a pump, allowing everyone to ensure relatively fair grooming. If the envisioned platform can really be realized, then the airdrop token distribution model will be adopted on a larger scale. Due to limited space, more details of the ideas will not be elaborated one by one. Anyone with discerning eyes should be able to discern the profound meaning behind it. Token Info Lockbox information box, relying solely on retail investors is not enough. Although we retail investors can reach a consensus on this, the real construction still requires the real backbone of the industry to lead the implementation @Star_okx @ wallet @ okxchinese okx has always been at the forefront in this area. Can we also take the lead this time? @Cz-binance @ binancezh cz, here is your favorite build. Can you come and build it? The formation of consensus on airdrop reform requires everyone's joint efforts to spread information!