For years, Kabosu, originating from a photo of a Shiba Inu taken by Japanese photographer Atsuko Sato, has transitioned from warm everyday photos into a global meme and cryptocurrency phenomenon, and now finds herself embroiled in a token farce she never participated in. Recently, she posted on social media under the handle @kabosumama to clarify the so-called CATE token has no connection to her, pointing out that her personal photos taken over the years and cat-related content on Instagram have been unauthorizedly used to "package" and promote what she calls a fraudulent token project. Influential accounts on X have even exacerbated the situation, creating a false illusion of "official endorsement" in market narratives. Faced with this misuse, she expressed clear disappointment and dissatisfaction, reiterating that this is a disrespect to her creation and the Kabosu image. In the same statement, she emphasized that, to date, she only recognizes two official projects linked to the Kabosu image: DOG and COCORO, asserting that all other tokens released under the Kuoboshu name or her name are unrelated to her. As this matter became public, the once-clear boundaries of the creator behind a globally famous meme have been forcibly blurred, making it increasingly difficult for investors to discern between true and false "official" associations, revealing the long-standing trust crisis and IP abuse issues in the Meme coin ecosystem, with this controversy seemingly revolving around a Shiba Inu image, actually sounding the alarm for the entire Meme coin ecosystem regarding trust and IP boundaries.
Doge Shiba Inu's Rise to Fame: From Photo to Global Meme
Before all the controversy, Kabosu was just an ordinary Shiba Inu in a Japanese family's living room. On an otherwise mundane day, owner Atsuko Sato raised her camera, capturing the dog's slightly confused yet somewhat "disgusted" expression, sharing these photos on her personal blog and social media account @kabosumama. Originally just daily shares for friends, they were repeatedly rewritten and reposted by netizens through English captions and collage processing, gradually solidifying into a unique tone: short, fragmented English, exaggerated internal monologues, paired with that complex gaze of the Shiba Inu profile, and thus the "Doge" meme quickly spread across global social media.
As the linguistic style of this photo was repeatedly imitated, Kabosu's image transformed from a family pet into an "emotion carrier" in internet contexts. With the rise of cryptocurrency narratives, the Doge meme was carried into the on-chain world, with Dogecoin directly featuring Kabosu's profile as its iconic image, elevating this Shiba Inu's prominence within the crypto community to a new height. After Dogecoin's rise, Kabosu almost became the default prototype for the entire Meme sector: whether paying homage to Doge culture or simply wanting to hitch a ride on a sense of familiarity, countless crypto projects began using this face, naming tokens around "dog," "Doge," and "Shiba Inu." As the Meme coin market expanded, the number of derivative tokens affiliated with Doge culture noticeably increased, with Kabosu's image repeatedly copied, transformed, and repurposed, bringing recognition to the projects while quietly laying a hidden risk—when almost everyone is telling stories using the same dog face, who has the right to claim they are "closer to official"? It will inevitably evolve into an unavoidable contest.
CATE Misuses Kabosu's Name: An Unauthorized Token Farce
Amidst the market's habitual questioning of "who is closer to official," a token named CATE quietly hitchhiked on the favorable momentum of the Kabosu family. Sato recounted the entire process in her statement: she regularly posted cat-related content on Instagram, which was unauthorizedly captured and repurposed into promotional materials, then bundled with the name "CATE," being repeatedly retweeted as the start of a narrative on social platforms. The photos originally meant to document life were forcibly spliced into the token narrative, as if she had tacitly consented to or participated in a "home cat theme" new project, with the visual and emotional familiarity being meticulously exploited into a false endorsement.
Confronted with this unauthorized "name borrowing," Sato used notably harsher language in her latest post. She not only stated unequivocally that her personal photos and cat content on Instagram were used without permission but directly labeled CATE as a "fraudulent token," drawing moral and trust boundaries for this farce. She mentioned that some influential accounts on X were involved in propagating the information, amplifying the misleading effect further, leading many observers to mistakenly believe there was an official connection between CATE and the Kabosu family. Therefore, Sato stressed in her statement that she has no cooperation, authorization, or endorsement relationship with CATE and reiterated that she only recognizes DOG and COCORO as official projects related to the Kabosu image—this proactive separation not only responds to the misuse of her personal creations but also attempts to protect the trust around the Kabosu meme IP and the community formed around it from being continuously eroded by a poorly handled token farce.
Celebrities and IP Being Exploited Abruptly: How Meme Coins Become Traps
In recent years' Meme coin context, CATE is not an isolated incident. The market has become accustomed to "fast-tracking" a new token using a celebrity, a particular photo, or a well-known meme prototype: first stitching together several stories on social media, then packaging the token as "official inspiration" or "author's choice," and then throwing it into the boiling timeline of meme culture, waiting for short-term funds and retail emotions to automatically take over. The Kabosu image's prominence in the crypto world originally stemmed from the photo taken and published by Atsuko Sato, yet in such an environment, has been repeatedly extended into new "project narratives," with CATE being the latest example.
The killer skill of such "hitching the hot trend" tokens lies not in technology but in narrative. Investors are exceedingly sensitive to "official endorsements" and "celebrity associations." As long as they see familiar dogs, cats, accounts, and screenshots, they can easily trust a newly emerged token without verification. Sato has previously clarified multiple times her lack of connection with certain tokens, and this time she was compelled to point out that her photos and cat content were unauthorizedly used to create and promote CATE, emphasizing that only DOG and COCORO are official projects related to the Kabosu image. This illustrates the consistently passive position of IP rights holders: statements are always made post-factum while funds have long surged and circulated under fraudulent narratives. Unauthorized content is enough to create a complete "story" in the market; this repeated misuse of celebrities and IPs not only exhausts individual creators' images but gradually erodes the already fragile trust foundations of the entire Meme coin sector.
Only Acknowledge DOG and COCORO: Official Endorsement and Market Imagination
In this clarification, Sato designated CATE as a "fraudulent token" while again drawing the boundaries very narrowly: she only acknowledges DOG and COCORO as projects with official connections to the Kabosu image, and all others are not in cooperation. This clear statement of "only recognizing these two" corrects the previously repeatedly blurred IP relationships, also providing a scarce "official list," allowing the market that has long been creating stories around the Kabosu image to first have a point of reference.
In the Meme coin ecosystem, such "official recognition" can be easily interpreted as a higher level of trust and a more solid long-term narrative foundation: having a prototype IP holder's approval means the stories being told are no longer just empty trendy hitches but extensions based on legal usage. Thus, DOG and COCORO gain a certain legitimacy at the narrative level, while tokens like CATE, built on unauthorized content, are directly categorized as "fraudulent," clearly exposing the differences in the legitimacy of the stories themselves. However, Sato's recognition only touches upon brand and image dimensions and does not equate to guarantees regarding any token's compliance, risk control, or return prospects. Even with the endorsement of the prototype IP, whether a project is transparent, respects holders' rights, and operates at reasonable risk levels still needs to be evaluated independently; market participants ultimately must take responsibility for their own risk assessment beyond narrative legitimacy.
Steering Clear of False-Promised Riches Through IP Theft: What Should Investors Do?
Looking back at the entire process surrounding the CATE incident, it is essentially a narrative of wealth built upon the abuse of others' images: unauthorizedly appropriating Atsuko Sato's photos and cat-related content to stitch together a token story "related to Kabosu," then amplifying the voice with the assistance of influential accounts on X, attempting to muddle the once-clear IP boundaries. Sato not only denied any relationship with CATE in her statement but also pointed directly to such projects as "fraudulent tokens," reaffirming that she only recognizes DOG and COCORO as official projects related to the Kabosu image. This action tells the market—rights holders have not abandoned their maintenance of their image and community trust boundaries; any claim of "official endorsement" must return to her original statements for verification. For investors, the primary action is not to chase the next meme trend but to calmly verify: whether the so-called "official," "genuine," or "co-branded" can find clear and traceable sources, whether it can be linked to publicly released information by the rights holders, or if it merely dwells in second-hand retelling and collage screenshots. Respecting creators and prototype IPs is not just a moral issue but the premise for the enduring existence of Meme culture; once the public becomes accustomed to ignoring the misuse of images, the memes themselves will gradually lose their charm in narrow trust erosion. In the current environment still lacking a complete regulatory and IP licensing framework, the Meme coin ecosystem's path to maturity can only be hoped to progress through three avenues: rights holders more clearly defining authorization and boundaries, projects decreasing the "grey area" of concept substitution in their promotions, and the community forming a consensus to recognize and resist false tokens and hot-trend hitches. When these three gradually take shape, investors may then have the opportunity to find more accurate risk coordinates in a narrative-laden market.
Join our community, let's discuss and become stronger together!
Exclusive Hyperliquid benefits for AiCoin: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
Exclusive Aster benefits for AiCoin: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
On-chain Twitter for AiCoin: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明:本文章仅代表作者个人观点,不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享,不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议,与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权,请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com,本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。




