On July 28, 2026, Franklin Templeton chose to express its stance on the social platform X: publicly aligning with the CLARITY Act, stating, "Now is the time to provide the regulatory clarity needed for the crypto industry," and pointed out that this act is expected to clarify the overall regulatory framework applicable to crypto assets in the United States, letting investors know what protections they have and helping businesses understand which regulatory bodies they fall under. While traditional asset management firms rarely speak out about crypto regulation, Senate Majority Leader John Thune made the opposite procedural choice – temporarily postponing the CLARITY Act, prioritizing government nominations and sanctions against Russia. Impacted by the late Senator Lindsey Graham's funeral occupying part of the legislative time this Tuesday and Wednesday, the Senate's process framework, already struggling to concurrently advance multiple contentious bills, pushed the CLARITY Act out of the near-term agenda. According to a single source, it might not enter the voting window until next week at the earliest, and this timing is still fraught with uncertainty. As the Senate is expected to recess around August 8, with remaining working days rapidly decreasing, the U.S. crypto industry and investors, eagerly awaiting regulatory clarity, can only continue to operate amidst the uncertainties of multiple regulations and enforcement from the SEC, CFTC, etc., accepting the reality that this much-anticipated act has again been postponed due to political priorities.
Traditional Asset Management Speaks Out: Wall Street Demands Clear Rules
In the same week that Congress pushed the CLARITY Act further down the agenda, traditional asset management giants in the U.S. chose to step into the spotlight. On July 28, 2026, Franklin Templeton posted on social platform X, stating, "Now is the time to provide the regulatory clarity needed for the crypto industry," explicitly supporting this shelved act. As a globally recognized asset management firm ranked among the industry's top in scale, it did not remain at a mere principled slogan but clearly articulated its expectations: this act will help clarify the regulatory framework applicable to U.S. crypto assets, letting investors know what protections are available and enabling businesses to understand which regulatory bodies they should be under. For Wall Street, this is the first time that demands, long discussed in conference rooms and legal letters, have been so concisely publicized on social media.
This public support for specific legislation signifies that traditional asset management institutions' tolerance for regulatory uncertainty is nearing its limit. In the past, Wall Street influenced rulemaking mainly through private lobbying and closed-door communications, but now, leading institutions have chosen to express their stance in the public discourse, effectively telling other financial institutions, crypto project parties, and trading platforms: compliance strategies can no longer be built on "grey areas," but must preemptively adjust layouts around a clearly forming regulatory framework. Franklin Templeton's expression provides a reference template for other institutions similarly pressured by the uncertainties of SEC and CFTC regulations and enforcement, further amplifying the political pressure on Congress to respond to the industry's demands for rule clarification within the limited legislative window.
Senate Priorities Shift Towards Nominations and Sanctions
In the same week that Franklin Templeton pushed for "regulatory clarity" into public discussion, Senate Majority Leader John Thune effectively hit the brakes on the CLARITY Act at the procedural level. The key issue is not his denial of crypto regulation itself, but rather a typical political sorting done within the limited agenda time: the Senate has historically found it difficult to advance multiple contentious bills simultaneously; once security, diplomacy, or high-level personnel matters are involved, they take precedence. Thune chose to first arrange for government official nominations and sanctions against Russia to enter voting and discussion, transforming the CLARITY Act from an item "that needs to be addressed promptly for the industry" into a topic "that can be postponed for the next window."
The time pressure further magnified this prioritization difference. This week, part of the legislative time on Tuesday and Wednesday was occupied by the late Senator Lindsey Graham's funeral, further compressing the already limited window for handling contentious bills. According to a single source, the CLARITY Act might not enter the voting process until next week, while the Senate is expected to recess around August 8, with limited working days remaining before recess. This means it may continue to be shelved during this session rather than being directly voted down or withdrawn. The result is that the regulatory framework for crypto assets remains murky under the jurisdictions of the SEC and CFTC, leaving the bill on the fringe of Congress's agenda, effectively delaying the industry’s pace of waiting for "clear rules before significant entry."
Delay in Regulatory Clarity: What It Means for Crypto Product Licensing
In light of the majority leader temporarily shelving the CLARITY Act, U.S. issuers of crypto assets, trading platforms, and fund managers are essentially locked into a "old framework + new risks" situation in the short term: on one hand, existing products still have to be structured, submitted for approval, or seek exemptions or registrations according to the established paths of securities and commodities regulators; on the other hand, there remains a lack of a unified, forward-looking legislative answer regarding who has what jurisdiction and what terms apply to crypto assets. Public information indicates that this act was originally expected to provide a clearer regulatory framework and direction for investor protection for crypto assets, but its delay now means that license applications and product compliance judgments can only continue to unfold within the grey areas of overlapping jurisdictions of agencies like the SEC and CFTC, increasing regulatory costs without truly rewriting the rules themselves.
For institutions, this delay most directly reflects in decisions regarding new product lines. Franklin Templeton pointed out that clearly defining which regulatory bodies enterprises should accept jurisdiction from is a key prerequisite for advancing compliance innovation and reducing legal risk – without this step, any publicly offered crypto products, crypto-asset-based funds, and related custody businesses will have to conduct self-review under the dual narrative of "possibly being considered securities" and "possibly being considered commodity derivatives." Delays in implementing investor protection provisions make institutions more conservative when evaluating whether to launch new crypto asset products or ETFs: they are both concerned that future legislation may deem existing structures non-compliant and unable to clearly explain the pathways for rights relief to end clients. In the short term, the shelving of the CLARITY Act has not frozen the crypto business itself, but effectively prolonged the transitional period of "operating in uncertainty first, then watching legislative trends," making any consideration of crypto licenses entering the U.S. market need to treat this uncertainty in timing as a core variable.
Narrowing Legislative Window: The Last Few Days Before August Recess
Time has begun to become a real constraint. Due to the funeral arrangements for the late Senator Lindsey Graham, part of the Senate's legislative time has been occupied on Tuesday and Wednesday. In a procedural framework that has already struggled to simultaneously advance multiple contentious bills, the CLARITY Act has been temporarily shelved by Senate Majority Leader John Thune, with government official nominations and sanctions against Russia positioned further ahead on the agenda. To date, the Senate has not publicly confirmed any specific voting date or agenda order for the CLARITY Act; only a single source claims that the act "may enter the voting process as early as next week," and this unconfirmed timeframe itself reveals high uncertainty.
As the Senate is anticipated to enter recess around August 8, the remaining working days can already be counted down daily, and the risk stemming from the narrowing of the legislative window has quickly amplified: even if there is a political intent for majority support, procedural delays may still push this act, which is meant to clarify the regulatory boundaries of SEC, CFTC, and others for U.S. crypto assets, into the next session, forcing platforms, projects, and institutional investors to continue operating under ambiguous enforcement expectations. Whether the CLARITY Act can truly squeeze into the limited agenda in the coming days will directly determine whether the period of ambiguity in U.S. crypto regulation is quickly compressed or quietly extended for at least another session.
As Wall Street and Congress Spar, How Does the Industry Position Itself?
In the reality where Franklin Templeton publicly calls for "regulatory clarity" while Senate Majority Leader prioritizes personnel appointments and sanctions against Russia, the regulatory gaps for U.S. crypto assets are clearly exposed: on one side are Wall Street institutions hoping to expand compliant product lines through a clear framework, while on the other is Congress, viewing the CLARITY Act as a movable item on the agenda. In the short term, crypto platforms can only continue to split their business within the existing framework, abdicating asset listings and product structures, trying to hedge enforcement uncertainty with more conservative compliance designs; project parties are leaning towards traditional securities regulation in fundraising, token circulation, and information disclosure to reduce the risk of being "retroactively classified"; institutional investors manage policy variables more through internal risk control and exposure limits, linking whether to allocate U.S. domestic crypto assets with the pace of the CLARITY Act's progression. Looking ahead, observable paths include: whether this act can be re-included in the Senate's limited legislative schedule before the recess around August 8, and whether it will continue to receive leadership attention in the next session. However, in the absence of any firm information on voting outcomes or timing, the industry can only acknowledge one fact – the turning point for U.S. crypto regulation will not be decided by the market itself but must be slowly squeezed out in the long political ordering.
Join our community to discuss and grow stronger together!
AiCoin exclusive Hyperliquid benefits: https://app.hyperliquid.xyz/join/AICOIN88
AiCoin exclusive Aster benefits: https://www.asterdex.com/zh-CN/referral/9C50e2
On-chain Telegram community: https://t.me/AiCoinWhaleData
On-chain community: https://www.aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=N6OVMor5g
AiCoin on-chain Twitter: https://x.com/aicoinwhaledata
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
