According to local reporting, the bitcoin had been voluntarily surrendered in November 2021 during a virtual asset investigation and stored offline in a USB-type hardware wallet as court evidence. The device itself remains intact, but a nationwide audit in January 2026 revealed the funds had been transferred to an external blockchain address without any reported physical breach.

Blockchain analysis confirmed the outflow, stunning officials who believed cold storage would prevent remote access. The loss went undetected for more than four years, raising sharp questions about monitoring procedures for seized digital assets. At current market prices, the missing 22 BTC are valued at roughly $1.5 million.

The discovery follows a separate incident in August 2025, when the Gwangju District Prosecutor’s Office lost 320 BTC in what officials later described as a phishing-related breach. In that case, credentials were compromised during an asset handover, allowing funds to be drained while the hardware wallet remained untouched.

The Gyeonggi Bukbu Provincial Police Agency has launched an internal investigation into the Gangnam case, reviewing access logs, personnel handling, and possible technical vulnerabilities. Authorities are examining whether phishing, improper key management, or insider involvement played a role. No recovery of the funds has been reported.

The back-to-back incidents have intensified scrutiny of how South Korean law enforcement manages seized cryptocurrency. Cold wallets are designed to keep private keys offline, but they still depend on human procedures, audits, and secure key handling. When those fail, even “offline” assets can disappear.

With two high-profile losses now public, pressure is building for tighter custody protocols, multi-signature controls, and more frequent audits. For a country known for strict crypto enforcement, the message is clear: securing digital evidence requires more than locking a USB drive in a drawer.

• What happened in the Gangnam bitcoin case?
  Police confirmed that 22 seized bitcoin were transferred out of a cold wallet without physical theft.
• How were the funds discovered missing?
  A nationwide audit in January 2026 uncovered the discrepancy through blockchain review.
• Was this the first such incident in South Korea?
  No, authorities previously reported a 320 BTC loss linked to phishing in August 2025.
• Have the missing bitcoin been recovered?
  No recovery has been announced as of mid-February 2026.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。