This week, in the Eastern Eight Zone time, driven by a significant pullback in Bitcoin and Ethereum, the cryptocurrency market experienced concentrated liquidations of hundreds of millions of dollars in the contract market, with short-term high-leverage longs becoming the biggest victims of this round of fluctuations. In contrast, some institutions chose to increase their holdings in a counter-trend manner during the price decline, expanding their quantitative and mining deployments, showing a rhythm distinctly different from emotional retail investors. At the same time, regulators continue to emphasize the balance between "investor protection" and "market efficiency" in hearings and statements, setting a systematic tone for the subsequent entry of compliant institutional products and traditional capital.

Consolidated Liquidation of Leveraged Longs and On-chain Transmission

● Liquidation Scale: According to CoinAnk/Coinglass data, approximately 291 million to 393 million USD in total contract liquidations occurred in 24 hours across the network, with long positions liquidating around 209 million to 286 million USD, making longs the primary victims in this round of severe fluctuations. The mismatch of high-leverage positions combined with tightening liquidity transformed what should have been a regular price pullback into a large-scale passive liquidation and margin squeeze event.

● Major Assets: Among the total liquidation positions, liquidations corresponding to BTC reached about 123 million to 158 million USD, while ETH liquidations were about 73.4 million to 126 million USD, indicating that the price volatility of major assets was exponentially amplified through high-leverage links. Since BTC and ETH are often seen as collateral and risk pricing anchors, their sharp pullbacks quickly transmit to other contracts and lending pools, magnifying systemic fluctuations both on-chain and off-chain.

● Reversal of Expectations: Long positions occupy an absolute majority in the liquidation structure, indicating that prior mainstream market expectations were significantly optimistic, with leveraged funds betting more on continuing upward trends. When the market turns, it triggered a chain reaction of position reductions and forced liquidations, with algorithmic clearing and automated risk controls overlapping, exacerbating the decline and panic in a short period, making the price trend closer to "liquidity踩踏" rather than fundamental repricing.

The "Buying Opportunity" Debate Amid Price Halving

● Mining Perspective: Bitfury co-founder Val Vavilov views the recent approximately 50% pullback as a "buying opportunity," representing the long-term logic of a category of traditional mining and infrastructure participants. From his perspective, a steep price drop is not a signal of systemic risk; rather, it is a window for optimizing holding costs and expanding hash power shares, aligning with his multi-year asset allocation framework.

● Cycle Divergence: In stark contrast to the concentrated short-term leveraged longs' liquidation, long-term investors focus more on the four-year halving cycle, the evolution of network hash rate, and actual adoption rates, rather than short-term daily or weekly pullback fluctuations. Under this framework, short-term price shocks are viewed as noise, with key variables shifting to electricity costs, equipment depreciation, regulatory environment, and the accumulation of network effects.

● Pricing System: This divergence reflects two parallel pricing systems: on one side are traders re-trading the volatility itself based on leverage, depth, and liquidity; on the other side are mining companies and institutions pricing chips based on hash power costs, financial statements, and long-term demand curves. The former passively reduce positions on liquidation days, while the latter attempt to structurally absorb outflowing chips within the same price range.

LTC Treasury Increases Holdings Amid Decline and Extends Cycle

● Counter-trend Accumulation: According to a single source, treasury company Luxxfolio increased its holdings by 2,413.464 LTC during the pressure phase of the market and simultaneously advanced mining deployments and capacity expansions. This type of operation shows that they value the ability of continuous on-chain output and long-term holding cost curves more than short-term paper profits, viewing asset volatility as an opportunity window to optimize unit costs and hedge electricity expenses.

● Cost Reduction: Treasury entities typically lower overall weighted costs of holdings during price correction periods through a dual path of "spot accumulation + mining expansion." Expanding hash power and inventory at low coin prices can reserve greater profit flexibility for the next upward cycle and help gain stronger dominance and liquidity supply capabilities in future fluctuations.

● Fund Contrast: This kind of "counter-trend operation" contrasts sharply with the passive liquidation of leveraged funds in the market, where one side is forcibly cleared out by the system after margin depletion, while the other side actively extends holding periods and optimizes financial structures. For ordinary participants, recognizing the behavioral pattern differences between these two types of funds helps distinguish between short-term technical market踩踏 and long-term capital inflows and outflows.

ICE Bets on Predictive Market Data Service and Institutional Risk Control

● Tool Launch: According to a single source, the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) has launched Polymarket Signals and Sentiment tools to provide institutional investors with signals and sentiment data based on predictive markets. This indicates that traditional financial infrastructures are beginning to systematically integrate the probability distributions and "public opinion" expectations mined from decentralized predictive markets.

● Cognitive Upgrade: This action elevates the narrative of predictive markets from "marginal speculative products" to quantifiable sources of sentiment and event probability data. For compliant institutions, this type of data, cleaned and modeled, can serve as a complementary dimension for strategies like macro event pricing, election outcome predictions, and policy expectation management, embedded into existing quantitative and risk control frameworks.

● Value Amid Volatility: In the context of contract liquidations and price shocks, such data tools are expected to help institutions more accurately measure emotional extremes and expectation distributions, thereby optimizing position adjustment rhythms and risk pricing. For example, when predictive markets sharply trend in one direction in a very short time, it may be seen as a signal of emotional overheating, assisting institutions in reducing leverage and hedging against extreme tail risks.

Institutional Space on the Regulatory Balance Path

● Three Pillars: SEC Chairman Paul S. Atkins reiterated that the SEC will continue to center its mission on protecting investors, maintaining fair and efficient markets, and facilitating capital formation, continuing the three pillars of traditional capital market regulatory frameworks. Such statements in the digital asset environment are seen as incorporating new asset classes into existing regulatory logic rather than completely overturning it.

● Balancing Demands: In the current context of severe fluctuations in digital asset prices and frequent leveraged liquidations, the rhetoric of "emphasizing protection and efficiency" addresses retail investors' concerns over extreme drawdowns and information asymmetries on one hand, while on the other hand leaving policy space for compliant products, institutional custody, and derivatives innovation. Regulation does not simply suppress volatility; rather, it aims to channel it into controllable institutional tracks.

● Restraining Leverage: The key variable in the future regulatory attitude will be how to define and constrain behaviors such as excessive leverage, off-market guidance, and insufficient information disclosure. If clearer and enforceable rules can be established for compliant derivatives, transparent data disclosure, and risk control parameters, institutional strategies will be more easily realized in a systematic manner, and liquidation events are more likely to be contained locally rather than evolving into a chain reaction across the entire market.

Post-Leverage Cleanup: Where Do Funds and Rules Go?

● Pricing Split: In this round of fluctuations, the concentrated liquidation of leveraged longs coexists with the counter-trend accumulation by institutions and mining companies, revealing that short-term trading and long-term allocation groups provide starkly different price interpretations of the same pullback. The former sees it as a punishment for trend termination and risk control failure, while the latter views it as a periodic opportunity for redistribution of chips to panic sellers.

● Foundation Solidification: On one hand, traditional infrastructure and regulatory agencies provide institutions with richer emotional and probability dimensions through measures such as launching predictive market data tools; on the other hand, they continue to stress the balance between investor protection and market efficiency, laying the foundation for larger-scale institutional participation with systems and information. This "dual construction" is expected to reshape the volatility structure and participant composition of the market in the coming years.

● Key Observations: Future follow-ups should focus on tracking the evolution of three main lines: First, whether the overall leverage level in the contract market continues to deflate to reduce the frequency of technical market踩踏; second, whether institutions and treasuries continue net accumulation during correction periods to consolidate their chips and voice; third, how much the rhythm of regulatory implementation on derivative rules and data disclosure standards changes the transmission paths of liquidation chains and risk pricing methods.

Join our community to discuss together and grow stronger!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh

OKX welfare group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance welfare group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。