Finally made it to the top 3 of the @Theo_Network rankings!

I was once in a predicament where I had no angle to write from.

Later, inspired by Foucault's "archaeology of knowledge," I gained a lot.

Traditional archaeology digs up artifacts, while Foucault digs into layers of discourse.

He does not make value judgments, nor does he say which layer is more advanced or more backward.

He simply describes how they operate and how they are shaped by power.

The real Web3 world is also a battleground of multi-layered discourse systems:

The narrative discourse of the project parties

The valuation discourse of capital

The implementation discourse of technology

Each layer has its own operational logic and is shaped by different powers.

Foucault teaches us

Not to rush to take sides, but to first understand how these discourses are formed.

How to operate specifically?

▌Excavate the archaeological layers of the project

Look not only at the white paper but also at the team's background, funding sources, and partners.

These constitute the "prehistory" of the project and determine its genes.

▌Observe the evolution of discourse

How does the narrative of the project change over time?

Which promises have been fulfilled, and which have quietly disappeared?

▌Identify the power structure

Who is driving this project? Who will benefit from it?

Are the interests of capital, the community, and the team aligned?

▌Predict future trends

Based on the existing discourse logic and power structure,

Which direction is the project most likely to develop?

When you stop trying to persuade others, it becomes easier to be trusted.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。